- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/11/15 at 7:45 pm to Catman88
quote:
100% without a doubt I would give up season tickets and never attend another LSU game in my life.
LSU would never see another dime from me.
I respect you for your honesty.
I respect you for saying you care more about your entertainment and potentially the source of your entertainments humanity.
I dont respect you as a person though.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 7:48 pm to BIGDAB
quote:
IF any coach in the SEC has a ounce of sense they would approach their players and ask them about the environment around campus. That way the players feel comfortable talking to the coach or coaches about anything related to race issues on campus.
The fanbase would response would be similar, since most fans of college schools look at these kids as sources of entertainment.
That would go miles, no pun intended, in recruiting. It's something that doesnt need to be publicized, and I dont think it would be. Will it happen? I dont know, ive never been a college athlete or in a locker of that sort. I would hope it happens. It benefits EVERYONE.
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 7:48 pm to Jerry ZP
Jerry can I buy you a beer? 
I've been arguing all day about this and people don't seem to understand athletes aren't just machines for the University. Just
I've been arguing all day about this and people don't seem to understand athletes aren't just machines for the University. Just
Posted on 11/11/15 at 7:49 pm to Catman88
Oh I wouldn't just stop there I would never hire any LSU grad the same way I will never hire an Mizzou grad with a degree after 2014.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 7:57 pm to Jerry ZP
Good coaches already do this type of thing, I can assure you of that.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 7:59 pm to Jerry ZP
I'd hope LSU students would be smart enough to fight real battles. Not over mythical poop graffiti
LSU is far from perfect it really isn't out of the realm of possibility that this could happen but I'd hope that it doesn't happen over some bs.
LSU is far from perfect it really isn't out of the realm of possibility that this could happen but I'd hope that it doesn't happen over some bs.
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:01 pm to Mr.Perfect
quote:
LSU players have goals for the next level. They would play
And I think the ones that don't have goals would refuse to sabotage their fellow players, the school, or their coaches....and protest on their own time.
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:01 pm to Catman88
I don't think anyone that's followed the situation will ever view mizzou the same which really sucks for the normal students there
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:05 pm to member12
quote:
And I think the ones that don't have goals would refuse to sabotage their fellow players, the school, or their coaches....and protest on their own time.
I don't think this type of decision by the players would affect their chances at the next level.
Remember talent rules over everything. One game wouldn't hurt an elite talents potential to get drafted to the next level.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:09 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
I'd hope LSU students would be smart enough to fight real battles. Not over mythical poop graffiti
If LSU were 3-6 or having a shitty season, it would be more likely.
I'd be really pissed if I were one of the Mizzou players now, in light of some of the events of the past 24 hours.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:14 pm to Jerry ZP
Black protesters marched on campus. They said the purple and gold confederate flag (which was flown by tailgaters on game day) was offensive and it needed to be taken down.
They marched to the Chancellor's office on a home game day. He praised them for rallying around a worthy cause. But he told them their first amendment rights which gave them the freedom to assemble and protest also protected the flag supporters.
The school then put pressure on te manufactures for using the LSU color scheme. They aren't made anymore.
Win-win.
They marched to the Chancellor's office on a home game day. He praised them for rallying around a worthy cause. But he told them their first amendment rights which gave them the freedom to assemble and protest also protected the flag supporters.
The school then put pressure on te manufactures for using the LSU color scheme. They aren't made anymore.
Win-win.
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:26 pm to logjamming
Its different when it comes from the players.
The chanchellor cant do a "win-win" with the players.
He'll lose the team and his job.
Money rules and Football is the cash crop.
Chancellors are replaceable. Quality football teams (players) are not. Ask Chip Kelly.
The chanchellor cant do a "win-win" with the players.
He'll lose the team and his job.
Money rules and Football is the cash crop.
Chancellors are replaceable. Quality football teams (players) are not. Ask Chip Kelly.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:31 pm to Jerry ZP
WTF how stupid is that statement?
1. It a fricking sport and not the reason for a university.
2. We literally replace players at min every 4-5 years. How can you say they are not replaceable? A good chancellor is worth wayyyyyyy more to a university than a kid that will be in campus for a few years.
1. It a fricking sport and not the reason for a university.
2. We literally replace players at min every 4-5 years. How can you say they are not replaceable? A good chancellor is worth wayyyyyyy more to a university than a kid that will be in campus for a few years.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:32 pm to Jerry ZP
The rant would rejoice because Trey Quinn the GOAT would get more action 
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:43 pm to Catman88
quote:
1. It a fricking sport and not the reason for a university.
You'd rethink what LSU or other SEC institutions are without its football. Its identity and public image is embedded in Saturday afternoons. And its a revenue generator.
quote:
2. We literally replace players at min every 4-5 years. How can you say they are not replaceable? A good chancellor is worth wayyyyyyy more to a university than a kid that will be in campus for a few years.
QUALITY players are not replaceable. Without top flight talent, we are FIU or Mid Tenn State. Without talent, no one goes to the games. Without talent, we dont win. Without talent, we dont make money. Without talent we are ULL.
There are less highly skilled athletes in this whole than chancellors...their skills are easier to find than top flight athletes.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:46 pm to Jerry ZP
You are a terrible troll, and I wish you nothing but malice
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:47 pm to Jerry ZP
Yeah Tulane and GA Tech are hurting as institutions of higher learning 
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:53 pm to Catman88
They dont win like we, bama, UGA, etc win though.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:54 pm to Catman88
quote:
Yeah Tulane and GA Tech are hurting as institutions of higher learning
You can't compare LSU or any school in this state to Gtech.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News