Started By
Message

re: How should we define light or intermittent smoking? Does it matter?

Posted on 3/4/18 at 8:28 pm to
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155596 posts
Posted on 3/4/18 at 8:28 pm to
A complete scallywag.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75193 posts
Posted on 3/4/18 at 8:28 pm to
Houma Sapien stop
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14962 posts
Posted on 3/4/18 at 9:26 pm to
BMJ in 2005 published data looking at roughly 43,000 people who smoked 1-4 cigarettes a day from 1970-2002. All cause mortality and ischemic heart disease (heart attacks) were significantly higher in the smoking group.

No significant difference in the general term "cancer," across men/women. When looking at lung cancer only, there was a statistically significant increased risk in women that seemed present but didn't quite reach significance in men (trends that way though, but relative risk crosses 1 at the 95% confidence interval)


Can't answer your question directly with data but can be reasonably sure that it's worse than smoking none.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155596 posts
Posted on 3/4/18 at 9:44 pm to
Get a life, jerk.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75193 posts
Posted on 3/4/18 at 9:45 pm to
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
20317 posts
Posted on 3/5/18 at 12:24 am to
quote:

The intake form at a Cancer Center I went to asked "How many cigarettes have you smoked?"

Not how long, not how many packs- how many individual cigarettes.



I smoked in college and off and on till I was about 27 or so. Anytime a medical question is asked and they get harpy on the "ever used tobacco", I just tell them no.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram