- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/21/15 at 3:48 pm to Grim
I think it is literally the price of being a celebrity. I don't think the "skill" gap is that great between famous actors and the not so famous ones. The extra money Brad Pitt makes to be lead actor in a film is all about the market for Brad Pitt, which the paparazzi help build and satisfy.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 3:57 pm to Grim
quote:
How do you feel about paparazzi?
Indifferent. Don't care to look at pics of celebrities shopping and I don't really give a shite that fame seeking, multi-millionaire celebrities are bothered by them.
This post was edited on 10/21/15 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:08 pm to OweO
quote:
They would not exist if there was no demand for celeb pictures so I think the root of the problem are the customers.
And there would be no demand by customers if the celebrities could be photographed to the point that it's no big deal.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:10 pm to Grim
quote:
paparazzi
I think they are scum bags.....but the name kind of lends itself to some Italian dish.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:10 pm to Grim
paparazzi and celebrities deserve each other.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:11 pm to Grim
Should be ok to shoot papparazzi. Taze at the minimum. Stalking bastards.
Popular
Back to top

0






