- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years
Posted on 7/19/22 at 2:12 pm to CoyoteSong
Posted on 7/19/22 at 2:12 pm to CoyoteSong
As opposed to your preferred explanation of how life came to exist as it does today: Magic sky man make all things I see
1
Posted on 7/19/22 at 2:52 pm to Bronc
quote:
As opposed to your preferred explanation of how life came to exist as it does today: Magic sky man make all things I see
I believe in intelligent design.
You believe in evolution which has zero dna evidence, no fossil evidence (keep looking for that missing link pal) and zero observable evidence. Nothing creating everything is nonsense.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 3:04 pm to CoyoteSong
quote:
I believe in intelligent design.
Which has zero evidence to support it as an explanation for how life got to it's current state.
quote:
You believe in evolution which has zero dna evidence, no fossil evidence (keep looking for that missing link pal) and zero observable evidence.
It has all those things, I even offered you some challenges that's only possibly conclusion stems from evolutionary theory, which, predictably, you promptly ignored to post shite from the Creationist Research Institiute(an oxymoron for sure).
Like I said earlier, I welcome your alternative explanation for how we got chihuahua's and pit bulls all from the same genetic ancestor?
Posted on 7/19/22 at 3:46 pm to Bronc
There is zero evidence that supports evolution. Just a lot of imagination to fill in the huge gaps of this fairy tale.
The more science advances in sophistication and technology the more it favors intelligent design and rejects evolution.
You are on the wrong side of history. But keep believing fish become philosophers and nothing created everything if it helps you sleep.
The more science advances in sophistication and technology the more it favors intelligent design and rejects evolution.
You are on the wrong side of history. But keep believing fish become philosophers and nothing created everything if it helps you sleep.
Posted on 7/19/22 at 4:00 pm to CoyoteSong
quote:
There is zero evidence that supports evolution. Just a lot of imagination to fill in the huge gaps of this fairy tale.
Once again
Like I said earlier, I welcome your alternative explanation for how we got chihuahua's and pit bulls all from the same genetic ancestor?
quote:
The more science advances in sophistication and technology the more it favors intelligent design and rejects evolution.
Interesting. Give me examples, specifically, with supporting evidence
Posted on 7/19/22 at 5:10 pm to CoyoteSong
quote:Intelligent design, on the other hand...tons of dna and fossil evidence for it.
I believe in intelligent design.
You believe in evolution which has zero dna evidence, no fossil evidence (keep looking for that missing link pal) and zero observable evidence. Nothing creating everything is nonsense.
This post was edited on 7/19/22 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 7/19/22 at 6:17 pm to Gravitiger
Another what? Person who recognized how big of a fig you were in that particular exchange with someone who wasn't being flippant? I imagine I'm one of many.
Let's agree to disagree about your douchebagery. Unless you wish to continue.
Let's agree to disagree about your douchebagery. Unless you wish to continue.
Posted on 7/20/22 at 4:50 pm to tide06
quote:
Sure, go ahead and celebrate the means of your enslavement.
If rockin hot tits are wrong, I don’t want to be right.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 7:01 am to Bronc
quote:
Like I said earlier, I welcome your alternative explanation for how we got chihuahua's and pit bulls all from the same genetic ancestor?
This is not a observable evidence of a change of kind. What was the same ancestor? Was it also a dog? Did you observe the slow changes? Post your evidence, please. DNA does not support evolution in general unless you fill in the gaps with words such as “maybe” and “we think they are related”.
Please try again to give an example of observable evidence of a change if kind.
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 8:26 am
Posted on 7/21/22 at 7:22 am to Bronc
quote:
Do you really think evolution is this singular process where magically you can set a camera on a bird and tomorrow it becomes a lizard?
Scientific method by definition by definition: needs to be observable and repeatable. Evolution is not science. It is a faith. When you discover the huge lack of evidence in dna and fossil records your faith of evolution has to grow even more.
Personally anybody who believes fish become philosophers is a freaking idiot in my book.
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 7:23 am
Page 22 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News