- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has this video been discussed? Woman punching Baltimore Cop
Posted on 6/1/20 at 5:22 pm to TigerintheNO
Posted on 6/1/20 at 5:22 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:She should have been shot
The woman was arrested.
Posted on 6/1/20 at 5:23 pm to Tiger Ike
quote:
Odds are the cop who hit the woman will get reassigned to another jurisdiction.
Hire him as BRPD chief
Posted on 6/1/20 at 5:26 pm to crap4brain
Cops should just call in sick. Take a vacation week. Why go to work when you’re just going to be assaulted and if you react you lose your job?
Posted on 6/1/20 at 5:51 pm to LSU4eva7
Cliff notes: second cop should have tased or spray her!
Ok, about eye for an eye/appropriate response to a threat, according to the PPCT System used by many law enforcement agencies:
(Not an exact quote from the book, but the general language with which this is taught to law enforcement trainees)
In order to gain control, an officer is allowed to respond to resistance with equal or one level higher control tactics than the type of resistance encountered. So, she presented active aggression (punching first officer), the equal level of response as per PPCT is hard empty hands or intermediate weapons (chemical weapons or Taser). Second officer chose hard empty hands ( punched her). There are some “exceptions/qualifiers that enters in, but way too deep to go into here but, in general, as a long time instructor of the system, he very likely wouldhave been in the clear if he had tased or pepper sprayed her.
This is VERY generalized, there’s way more to this system than could be explained here. It takes a 40 hour week of initial training and scheduled quarterly/bi-annual trainings for years to completely grasp the system.
An added thought, not all agencies provide appropriate training, whether it’s PPCT or Monadnock or some similar system.
Ok, about eye for an eye/appropriate response to a threat, according to the PPCT System used by many law enforcement agencies:
(Not an exact quote from the book, but the general language with which this is taught to law enforcement trainees)
In order to gain control, an officer is allowed to respond to resistance with equal or one level higher control tactics than the type of resistance encountered. So, she presented active aggression (punching first officer), the equal level of response as per PPCT is hard empty hands or intermediate weapons (chemical weapons or Taser). Second officer chose hard empty hands ( punched her). There are some “exceptions/qualifiers that enters in, but way too deep to go into here but, in general, as a long time instructor of the system, he very likely wouldhave been in the clear if he had tased or pepper sprayed her.
This is VERY generalized, there’s way more to this system than could be explained here. It takes a 40 hour week of initial training and scheduled quarterly/bi-annual trainings for years to completely grasp the system.
An added thought, not all agencies provide appropriate training, whether it’s PPCT or Monadnock or some similar system.
Popular
Back to top

0





