- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Harvey Weinstein allegedly jumped on top of a woman and forcibly
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:12 am
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:12 am
Gave her oral sex.
So not only did she come back for more after he pulled the Louis C.K. on her, but he also managed to force her into a position where, without her consent, he tongued her cootch?
I have doubt
quote:
Weinstein met her at the Montage Hotel in Beverly Hills in late 2015 to discuss a part in the television series "Marco Polo," which Weinstein and his company were producing. The producer asked her if he could masturbate in front of her, and when she refused, he held her by the wrist and forced her to watch him, the lawsuit said.
The next incident happened several months later at the same hotel, according to the lawsuit. The woman agreed to meet Weinstein to discuss the "Marco Polo" role again, and this time alleges Weinstein threw her on a bed, started performing oral sex on her and put his penis inside her vagina before starting to start masturbate on her, the lawsuit states.
So not only did she come back for more after he pulled the Louis C.K. on her, but he also managed to force her into a position where, without her consent, he tongued her cootch?
I have doubt
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:16 am to baybeefeetz
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/15/17 at 5:17 am
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:19 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
I have doubt
Yeah he usually doesn't do things like that
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:20 am to baybeefeetz
So from what I've gathered, an Oscars after party is just a bunch of dudes jerking it in front of half-bored/half-horrified women.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:21 am to TH03
You don’t think the allegations here strain credulity, regardless of his ALLEGED history?
Duke lacrosse.
Duke lacrosse.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:22 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
Duke lacrosse
Terrible comparison
Keep protecting a known perv and assaulter though.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:25 am to TH03
I’m talking about this single allegation. On its face it is hard to beliver.
The old forced cunnilingus. Sure.
The old forced cunnilingus. Sure.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:27 am to TH03
quote:
Yeah he usually doesn't do things like that
Don’t be intentionally obtuse. “OMG he’s so deplorable he masturbated in front me in his hotel room and then I decided to come back for seconds!”
This post was edited on 11/15/17 at 5:40 am
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:34 am to TH03
Hajib Barbie woulda cut his head off.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:35 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
The old forced cunnilingus. Sure.
Grab them by the pussy with your tongue.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:36 am to TH03
quote:
Terrible comparison
When people say “Duke Lacrosse,” it’s mostly to say that accusers sometimes lie.
And I would argue here that Weinstein now is way more of an opportune target at this time than the duke lacrosse guys were.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:39 am to baybeefeetz
I mean she doesn’t even try to play the coercion angle. It’s blatant that she knew what he was about but wanted an acting role that bad.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:45 am to 13SaintTiger
quote:
then I decided to come back
Wow she went back to meet with her boss? What a slut!
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:45 am to 13SaintTiger
quote:
she knew what he was about but wanted an acting role that bad.
Which was his MO: prey on girls who are desperate for jobs.
quote:
And I would argue here that Weinstein now is way more of an opportune target at this time than the duke lacrosse guys were.
Aw poor baby Weinstein.
This post was edited on 11/15/17 at 5:46 am
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:50 am to TH03
You don’t get it. Nobody is arguing that he deserves sympathy or to be believed in general. This thread is about the believability of these specific allegations.
You want this discussion to fit into your view of things, but it evidently doesn’t. So maybe you should move along to where your grasp and the topic are a better fit.
You want this discussion to fit into your view of things, but it evidently doesn’t. So maybe you should move along to where your grasp and the topic are a better fit.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:54 am to 13SaintTiger
quote:Yep. Apparently Hollywood is all about the Tit for Tat system.
It’s blatant that she knew what he was about but wanted an acting role that bad.
This post was edited on 11/15/17 at 5:55 am
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:56 am to baybeefeetz
Harvey's about 280 or so. he could probably forcibly do a lot of things to a 90 pound woman against her will including this.
However you are picturing this in your mind probably ain't how it went down.
However you are picturing this in your mind probably ain't how it went down.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 5:59 am to baybeefeetz
I'm confused, did she have a ficus between her legs or something?
Posted on 11/15/17 at 6:01 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
You don’t get it. Nobody is arguing that he deserves sympathy or to be believed in general. This thread is about the believability of these specific allegations.
You're giving the benefit of the doubt to someone who has lost the privilege of the benefit of the doubt.
quote:
You want this discussion to fit into your view of things, but it evidently doesn’t. So maybe you should move along to where your grasp and the topic are a better fit.
Popular
Back to top

7








