- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI now thinks they'll lose in court, postpones Apple iPhone hearing
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:12 pm to NYNolaguy1
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:12 pm to NYNolaguy1
basically apple's unhackable phone will hacked
1
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:13 pm to idlewatcher
quote:They're a business.
Apple has gotten too greedy
It's their duty to:
1) Generate profit
2) Protect their consumers
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:16 pm to SanJoseTigerFan
quote:
it has to do with reading energy that comes of the phone when touched.
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:16 pm to MrSmith
Think oscilloscope and peak is 1 and valley is 0 binary code....
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:19 pm to SanJoseTigerFan
If this is true, they deserve to get in.
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:26 pm to CP3
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/8/20 at 10:27 am
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:30 pm to SanJoseTigerFan
quote:
basically apple's unhackable phone will hacked
no one said it was unhackable. Apple just said they wouldn't be the ones to hack it. I missed the original comment before it got deleted.
From what I can gather, are you saying they're going to use a form of Van Eck Phreaking?
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:34 pm to colorchangintiger
quote:Him deleting comments has peaked my interest a little
I missed the original comment before it got deleted.
quote:
Van Eck Phreaking
That's exactly what it sounds like to me
This post was edited on 3/22/16 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:47 pm to MrSmith
quote:
Van Eck Phreaking
yes
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:49 pm to JumpingTheShark
quote:
Yeah I am kind of indifferent toward this. I don't like the idea of the police state, but I also don't have anything to hide and couldn't really care less if the government is interested in the dumbass conversations me and my jackass friends are having.
So you'd be okay with them rummaging through your house and chest of drawers because you have nothing to hide?
Posted on 3/22/16 at 3:52 pm to LSUTANGERINE
"You sure do have a lot of ammo."
"Ha. I wouldn't really call 200 rounds 'a lot'."
Government Agent gives a strange look and scribbles on his note pad.
"Ha. I wouldn't really call 200 rounds 'a lot'."
Government Agent gives a strange look and scribbles on his note pad.
Posted on 3/22/16 at 4:01 pm to SanJoseTigerFan
quote:
Van Eck Phreaking
Just googled that up and was kind of freaked out by what I read. Especially the instances involving electronic voting systems.
Posted on 3/22/16 at 5:05 pm to Hog Zealot
Update: The FBI thought they would lose at court, then asked to postpone the hearing.
LINK
quote:
At the heart of the U.S. government's case against Apple was that it could not unlock the San Bernardino shooter's iPhone 5c without Apple's help. And yet that also appears to be its greatest weakness, leading the FBI to request a postponement of a court hearing Tuesday out of concern that it would not win, experts told International Business Times.
The FBI and tech giant Apple had been set to square off over whether the company should be required to build new software capable of unlocking the phone used by Syed Farook, a so-called backdoor to the iPhone's extensive encryption. Instead, the FBI revealed in acourt filing Monday evening it may no longer need Apple’s assistance to open the iPhone now that an outside party has demonstrated “a possible method for unlocking Farook’s phone,” pending a presentation for the Justice Department.
Not only is that an indication the government believes a third party can break Apple’s encryption, but, experts said, it also seems to prove that the Justice Department will be unable to prove in court it has exhausted every resource as is required under the All Writs Act.
quote:
Failure to answer in the affirmative could be enough to not only lose the case but also set a precedent that could hinder future cases where the government seeks to break encryption. Government lawyers would also have to contend with a Brooklyn judge’s February ruling, in an unrelated drug case, that the All Writs Act does not give the government the power to force Apple to break its own encryption. That decision is not legally binding in the San Bernardino, California, case, though it would inevitably influence the court proceedings, according to Brian Owsley, a former magistrate judge who has ruled on a number of electronic surveillance issues.
LINK
Posted on 3/23/16 at 12:36 am to NYNolaguy1
Bookmark for later if you would like
Posted on 3/23/16 at 12:36 am to SanJoseTigerFan
********
This post was edited on 3/23/16 at 12:40 am
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News