Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Exxon Mobil and Chevron Megadeals Are Cleared of FTC Antitrust Concerns

Posted on 1/18/25 at 8:34 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
25020 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 8:34 am
quote:

The Federal Trade Commission on Friday approved separate consent orders resolving antitrust concerns over two multibillion-dollar oil deals: Exxon Mobil’s purchase of Pioneer Natural Resources and Chevron’s acquisition of Hess HES.

Under the order for Exxon’s $60 billion merger, the company is prohibited from nominating, designating or appointing former Pioneer Chief Executive Officer Scott Sheffield to its board of directors. He is additionally barred from serving in any advisory role to Exxon’s board or management team, the FTC said.

Chevron, according to the order for its $53 billion deal for Hess, won’t be allowed to let Hess CEO John Hess serve on its board. Barring certain expectations, he would be blocked from serving in an advisory role to Chevron’s board or management team as well.

The FTC has ramped up its scrutiny of oil and gas deals as the oil patch has seen frantic M&A activity.

These orders follow complaints from the agency alleging that Sheffield and Hess separately attempted to collude and communicated with competitors about global oil output, which could have resulted in American consumers and businesses paying higher prices for gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil and jet fuel.

At the time of these allegations, Sheffield said the FTC built its case against him on a false narrative about his statements and a dubious interpretation of the law. Hess’s board, meanwhile, said the allegations against its CEO were without merit.


LINK

I mean...shite, did the FTC expect that oil company CEOs would instead tell OPEC during the COVID oil demand crash "Hey, guys, yall need to flood the market more"?
Posted by UnoMe
Here
Member since Dec 2007
6325 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 9:12 am to
What bout M-Tex & Billy Bob?
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
25020 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 9:15 am to
Billy Bob needs to move his wife and daughter out of that house seven weeks ago because that is a lawsuit waiting to happen.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
25640 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 10:32 am to
As a long time XOM and CVX shareholder I would say this is fricking AWESOME.

quote:

ragincajun03


If you recall you and I were just discussing the "potential" benefits of loosening regulation of the industry. Well here is some reality (and more to follow).
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20066 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 12:25 pm to
I was hoping XOM was going to come out ahead on the Guyana deal.
Posted by Yaboylsu63
Member since Mar 2014
2159 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 12:29 pm to
Ignorant question but is these mega mergers in O&G good or bad for the total health of the US market?

Personally I’d love to see lots of competition and not 2 major conglomerates in any market segment but I’m also not educated enough to be sure in this case.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
125768 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

These orders follow complaints from the agency alleging that Sheffield and Hess separately attempted to collude and communicated with competitors about global oil output, which could have resulted in American consumers and businesses paying higher prices for gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil and jet fuel.



Well, you want oil to live above 60 but below 90. And don’t get me wrong, you’re still printing money at 90, but gas gets up over $3.50 a gallon, it starts to pinch. It hits a hundred, every product in America has to readjust its price. $78 a barrel, that’s about perfect. You know, brings enough profit to keep exploring, but it don’t sting as much at the pump.
This post was edited on 1/18/25 at 12:34 pm
Posted by LCrox
Alabama (the smart area)
Member since Sep 2019
551 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 12:46 pm to
Exxon’s arbitration case regarding its claim of right-of-first-refusal to Hess’ 30% stake in Guyana’s Stabroek block should be the only remaining obstacle, correct?
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
25640 posts
Posted on 1/18/25 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Exxon’s arbitration case regarding its claim of right-of-first-refusal to Hess’ 30% stake in Guyana’s Stabroek block should be the only remaining obstacle, correct?


Yes and they will sort that out in arbitration. The big hump was getting past the FTC.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram