- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Entergy needs seven new power plants for the META Data Centers
Posted on 4/15/26 at 7:59 pm to nicholastiger
Posted on 4/15/26 at 7:59 pm to nicholastiger
Meta is guaranteed to pay for everything built for them, even if they use 0 electricity, based on their minimum bill structure… Most likely to save the “tax” payers lots and lots and lots based on actual expected usage.
Tired of seeing ignorant takes about these deals - quite literally single handle saving us 10%+ on our bills when we desperately need help due to doubling costs of pretty much everything electricity related.
Tired of seeing ignorant takes about these deals - quite literally single handle saving us 10%+ on our bills when we desperately need help due to doubling costs of pretty much everything electricity related.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:02 am to BilltheTiger
quote:
Unless they negotiated a bad deal and are charging less than the cost to produce it should not affect the residential rate at all.
False.
What you should have said is “unless Entergy’s deal with Meta recoups less than the return they are guaranteed as a regulated utility, it should not affect the residential rate at all.” Which is a much lower bar, that you’d have to be a bit naive to disregard.
Basically any “discount” Meta receives as part of this deal will wind up being passed on to other rate payers. And that’s the thing - if there weren’t a discount, why would the contract details be hidden behind an NDA?
Entergy’s entire existing generation capacity in Louisiana is something like 24 GW. They are looking to add another 10 GW in relation to this project. For a company that makes a guaranteed return on capital projects, that’s a windfall regardless of who pays for it. They have a major incentive to get this done, so you can bet they will pull out every PR tool in their bag to do so. They will leverage every relationship, whether on the PSC, in the legislature, the media, or wherever. They will continue to tell everyone how this is going to make life better for everyone.
But you know what they won’t do? Release the actual details of the contract.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:10 am to Roy Curado
quote:
Do your own research and deep dive into these deals and stop taking propaganda headlines at face value.
The only details you can research are the ones being publicly disclosed by Entergy (or Meta), selectively, to try to paint the deal in the best possible light.
Call me crazy, but I don’t think we should accept “source: trust me bro” from Entergy when we are talking about a 50% increase in statewide generation capacity.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:17 am to lostinbr
quote:
The only details you can research are the ones being publicly disclosed by Entergy (or Meta), selectively, to try to paint the deal in the best possible light.
I'm curious if/where buried and redacted in all of this is a "termination for convenience" clause for META or a majority stakeholder.
So if 5-10 years from now if META (or Blue Owl/ Blackrock) aren't seeing the returns that they want; they pull the plug and leave us on the hook for everything.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:23 am to Techdave
quote:
A bit like a perpetual motion machine, eh?
Need to find this guy's invention in the back woods of Mississippi.
Popular
Back to top

0




