- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DSLR camera and lense buying advice
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:37 am to cave canem
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:37 am to cave canem
quote:
No adapter necessary it is internal on the D5300.
When I compared the two cameras the biggest difference was the flip out screen. They have most of the same internals. The wifi adaptor for my d3300 came with a small case that stays attached to the strap, and is very easy to use.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:38 am to cave canem
There are some good suggestions posted above. I'm a Canon guy and have a lot of money invested in equipment but I was at Sam's this week and they have a good deal on a T5 with kit lenses that is great for starting out.
You may want to check it out.
You may want to check it out.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:51 am to TthomasJR
Action shot (75mph)
Low light
S5
Not bad
Low light
S5
Not bad
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:53 am to Placebeaux
I have photos that look like that taken on an iPhone 4 and 5.
Sure they can take great photos at times, but sometimes you need more from your camera.
Sure they can take great photos at times, but sometimes you need more from your camera.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:53 am to Placebeaux
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:55 am to EWE TIGER
Q: What kind of camera should I buy, Nikon or Canon?
If you’re not already invested in lenses, flip a coin.
Q: What kind of lens should I buy?
A: What kind of pictures are you planning to take?
Because here’s the deal: there is no magic pill that will reverse the effects of aging, remove unwanted pounds without diet or exercise, grow you an instant billionaire overnight by working from home. It’s the same thing with photography. There is no brand name or system (DSLR or mirroless or PAS or medium format or instant) body-lens combo that will deliver you the images you want. And there is no single lens that will work for every situation, every job. (Although, there are some that come close; but again, that depends on the "look" the photographer is trying to achieve, and that's not something anyone else can answer for you. I have a 35mm f/1.4 from a German brand that they will pry from my cold, dead fingers, and it's on my various digital bodies 90 percent of the time. But that's me.)
Buy the best lens you can afford, because lenses are investments; a digital camera body depreciates. Don't buy a kit lens (the crappy zoom/variable aperture lens that camera manufacturers and stores package with a camera body and sell to people who have no idea how important the lens is in this transaction), you're better off shooting with a phone camera than a crappy kit lens, especially if your main subject is indoors. The glass is where it all begins. It's not the phones that are taking good/bad images; it's the (especially Zeiss) glass in the newer smart phones making that imaging difference. It's all about the lens.
Lots of pros are unloading their DSLR systems so you might be smart to pick up a used system right now rather than buying new (especially as the market for selling DSLR gear later is shrinking.) LINK
Look at Fuji's X-T1; the lens lineup won't be anything to write home about until Q2 2015, but the "pancake" lens (27mm f/2.8, which is the equivalent of a 35mm SLR lens) is an affordable and favorably reviewed start and they're all on sale this week. If the X-T1 is more than you want to spend on a body, work down (X-M1) and spend more money on a good prime lens. LINK
Hope this helps. Giving camera buying advice is a lot like setting friends up on a blind date. LINK

If you’re not already invested in lenses, flip a coin.
Q: What kind of lens should I buy?
A: What kind of pictures are you planning to take?
Because here’s the deal: there is no magic pill that will reverse the effects of aging, remove unwanted pounds without diet or exercise, grow you an instant billionaire overnight by working from home. It’s the same thing with photography. There is no brand name or system (DSLR or mirroless or PAS or medium format or instant) body-lens combo that will deliver you the images you want. And there is no single lens that will work for every situation, every job. (Although, there are some that come close; but again, that depends on the "look" the photographer is trying to achieve, and that's not something anyone else can answer for you. I have a 35mm f/1.4 from a German brand that they will pry from my cold, dead fingers, and it's on my various digital bodies 90 percent of the time. But that's me.)
Buy the best lens you can afford, because lenses are investments; a digital camera body depreciates. Don't buy a kit lens (the crappy zoom/variable aperture lens that camera manufacturers and stores package with a camera body and sell to people who have no idea how important the lens is in this transaction), you're better off shooting with a phone camera than a crappy kit lens, especially if your main subject is indoors. The glass is where it all begins. It's not the phones that are taking good/bad images; it's the (especially Zeiss) glass in the newer smart phones making that imaging difference. It's all about the lens.
Lots of pros are unloading their DSLR systems so you might be smart to pick up a used system right now rather than buying new (especially as the market for selling DSLR gear later is shrinking.) LINK
Look at Fuji's X-T1; the lens lineup won't be anything to write home about until Q2 2015, but the "pancake" lens (27mm f/2.8, which is the equivalent of a 35mm SLR lens) is an affordable and favorably reviewed start and they're all on sale this week. If the X-T1 is more than you want to spend on a body, work down (X-M1) and spend more money on a good prime lens. LINK
Hope this helps. Giving camera buying advice is a lot like setting friends up on a blind date. LINK
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:56 am to Placebeaux
quote:
Yeah but we're talking about a guy that wants to buy a camera for his wife to take pics of their baby.
quote:
IMO there is no need to spend 800 on something you're not gonna use that much.
These are at complete odds with one another. I have a 4.5 month old and I've already taken over 1,000 pics of her.
This post was edited on 12/12/14 at 9:57 am
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:02 am to EWE TIGER
Canon EOS Rebel. True starter DSLR and fairly inexpensive. Yes there are better cameras, but this does enough until you will upgrade.....if you upgrade.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:03 am to EWE TIGER
Compare this..... Nikon D5100
To this..... Sony A6000
Check out the images online, especially low light images. Look at the continuous shooting rate for action shots for both cameras.
No real contest between the two.
ETA: Compare the images for any two cameras here... LINK
To this..... Sony A6000
Check out the images online, especially low light images. Look at the continuous shooting rate for action shots for both cameras.
No real contest between the two.
ETA: Compare the images for any two cameras here... LINK
This post was edited on 12/12/14 at 10:09 am
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:04 am to colorchangintiger
quote:
These are at complete odds with one another. I have a 4.5 month old and I've already taken over 1,000 pics of her.
Yup, my son is a little over a week old and I have nearly 2 Gbs of photos already.
Leading up to his birth I also practiced with my first dslr outside and taking tons of pictures around the house. I already have some great shots. Pictures that I could have only dreamed of getting with my iPhone.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:06 am to EWE TIGER
quote:
Pretty easy for me to justify the cost since we've spent about $1k in the last year having pictures taken.
This is a red flag. You are about to spend $600 on a new camera and still spend $1000 a year on professional pics for your kid because whoever uses the new camera won't know what they are doing. The professional photos look better because the person using the camera knows what they are doing and how to get the most out of that camera.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:11 am to slackster
Why would someone down vote the Panasonic GH4 post that I made?
LINK
For the money, it is the best camera in this thread. It can stand up to the others from a still picture standpoint, and it blows every other camera out of the water for video. The only comparable camera is the Sony A7S, but it is $1,000 more expensive.
LINK
For the money, it is the best camera in this thread. It can stand up to the others from a still picture standpoint, and it blows every other camera out of the water for video. The only comparable camera is the Sony A7S, but it is $1,000 more expensive.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:16 am to slackster
quote:
Why would someone down vote the Panasonic GH4 post that I made?
Lots of folks still have the Nikon/Canon mindset, thinking they're the best cameras out there. It's a perception thing, not a reality thing.
Folks are doing themselves a disservice by limiting themselves to the Nikon/Canon choices.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:26 am to justlookin
quote:
Folks are doing themselves a disservice by limiting themselves to the Nikon/Canon choices.
Canon and Nikon lead the industry in lens options.
All those big white lenses you see on the sidelines at sporting events are Canon L-glass lenses.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:32 am to Placebeaux
It's sad that you think that's a good photo. And no; it is not "Low light" or an "Action shot"
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:40 am to slackster
quote:
For the money
You mean for the most money?
He could nearly buy 3 Nikon d3300's for the cost of that camera.
He wants a quality entry level camera, and you are linking a camera that videographers use.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:42 am to Bmath
DSLRs are on their way out.
Go mirrorless with a Sony A7s or Panasonic GH4
Go mirrorless with a Sony A7s or Panasonic GH4
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:45 am to HeadyBrosevelt
quote:
DSLRs are on their way out.
Go mirrorless with a Sony A7s or Panasonic GH4
Seriously considered it, but I like being able to use my viewfinder in low light.
Popular
Back to top



0



