Started By
Message

re: DSLR camera and lense buying advice

Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:37 am to
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18856 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:37 am to
quote:

No adapter necessary it is internal on the D5300.


When I compared the two cameras the biggest difference was the flip out screen. They have most of the same internals. The wifi adaptor for my d3300 came with a small case that stays attached to the strap, and is very easy to use.
Posted by ElderTiger
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2010
7662 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:38 am to
There are some good suggestions posted above. I'm a Canon guy and have a lot of money invested in equipment but I was at Sam's this week and they have a good deal on a T5 with kit lenses that is great for starting out.
You may want to check it out.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:51 am to
Action shot (75mph)
Low light
S5
Not bad

Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18856 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:53 am to
I have photos that look like that taken on an iPhone 4 and 5.

Sure they can take great photos at times, but sometimes you need more from your camera.
Posted by TthomasJR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2006
17317 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:53 am to
Amazon D5100

This the sale I was talking about
Posted by geauxdux
Member since Sep 2010
19 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:55 am to
Q: What kind of camera should I buy, Nikon or Canon?

If you’re not already invested in lenses, flip a coin.

Q: What kind of lens should I buy?

A: What kind of pictures are you planning to take?

Because here’s the deal: there is no magic pill that will reverse the effects of aging, remove unwanted pounds without diet or exercise, grow you an instant billionaire overnight by working from home. It’s the same thing with photography. There is no brand name or system (DSLR or mirroless or PAS or medium format or instant) body-lens combo that will deliver you the images you want. And there is no single lens that will work for every situation, every job. (Although, there are some that come close; but again, that depends on the "look" the photographer is trying to achieve, and that's not something anyone else can answer for you. I have a 35mm f/1.4 from a German brand that they will pry from my cold, dead fingers, and it's on my various digital bodies 90 percent of the time. But that's me.)

Buy the best lens you can afford, because lenses are investments; a digital camera body depreciates. Don't buy a kit lens (the crappy zoom/variable aperture lens that camera manufacturers and stores package with a camera body and sell to people who have no idea how important the lens is in this transaction), you're better off shooting with a phone camera than a crappy kit lens, especially if your main subject is indoors. The glass is where it all begins. It's not the phones that are taking good/bad images; it's the (especially Zeiss) glass in the newer smart phones making that imaging difference. It's all about the lens.

Lots of pros are unloading their DSLR systems so you might be smart to pick up a used system right now rather than buying new (especially as the market for selling DSLR gear later is shrinking.) LINK

Look at Fuji's X-T1; the lens lineup won't be anything to write home about until Q2 2015, but the "pancake" lens (27mm f/2.8, which is the equivalent of a 35mm SLR lens) is an affordable and favorably reviewed start and they're all on sale this week. If the X-T1 is more than you want to spend on a body, work down (X-M1) and spend more money on a good prime lens. LINK

Hope this helps. Giving camera buying advice is a lot like setting friends up on a blind date. LINK
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Yeah but we're talking about a guy that wants to buy a camera for his wife to take pics of their baby.


quote:

IMO there is no need to spend 800 on something you're not gonna use that much.


These are at complete odds with one another. I have a 4.5 month old and I've already taken over 1,000 pics of her.
This post was edited on 12/12/14 at 9:57 am
Posted by Bamadiver
Member since Jun 2014
3903 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:

A crop factor is nothing more than a crop adjustment. It doesn't mean your 300mm lens becomes 450mm.

Semantics. The cropping itself provides equivalent magnifiction by the sensor crop factor.

LINK

LINK

LINK

LINK
Posted by HeavyCore
Member since Sep 2012
2552 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:02 am to
Canon EOS Rebel. True starter DSLR and fairly inexpensive. Yes there are better cameras, but this does enough until you will upgrade.....if you upgrade.
Posted by justlookin
Member since Mar 2014
257 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:03 am to
Compare this..... Nikon D5100

To this..... Sony A6000

Check out the images online, especially low light images. Look at the continuous shooting rate for action shots for both cameras.

No real contest between the two.

ETA: Compare the images for any two cameras here... LINK
This post was edited on 12/12/14 at 10:09 am
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18856 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:04 am to
quote:

These are at complete odds with one another. I have a 4.5 month old and I've already taken over 1,000 pics of her.


Yup, my son is a little over a week old and I have nearly 2 Gbs of photos already.

Leading up to his birth I also practiced with my first dslr outside and taking tons of pictures around the house. I already have some great shots. Pictures that I could have only dreamed of getting with my iPhone.
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6126 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Pretty easy for me to justify the cost since we've spent about $1k in the last year having pictures taken.


This is a red flag. You are about to spend $600 on a new camera and still spend $1000 a year on professional pics for your kid because whoever uses the new camera won't know what they are doing. The professional photos look better because the person using the camera knows what they are doing and how to get the most out of that camera.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91300 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:11 am to
Why would someone down vote the Panasonic GH4 post that I made?

LINK

For the money, it is the best camera in this thread. It can stand up to the others from a still picture standpoint, and it blows every other camera out of the water for video. The only comparable camera is the Sony A7S, but it is $1,000 more expensive.
Posted by justlookin
Member since Mar 2014
257 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Why would someone down vote the Panasonic GH4 post that I made?


Lots of folks still have the Nikon/Canon mindset, thinking they're the best cameras out there. It's a perception thing, not a reality thing.

Folks are doing themselves a disservice by limiting themselves to the Nikon/Canon choices.
Posted by Tbobby
Member since Dec 2006
4358 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Folks are doing themselves a disservice by limiting themselves to the Nikon/Canon choices.


Canon and Nikon lead the industry in lens options.

All those big white lenses you see on the sidelines at sporting events are Canon L-glass lenses.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87178 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:32 am to


It's sad that you think that's a good photo. And no; it is not "Low light" or an "Action shot"
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18856 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:40 am to
quote:

For the money


You mean for the most money?

He could nearly buy 3 Nikon d3300's for the cost of that camera.

He wants a quality entry level camera, and you are linking a camera that videographers use.
Posted by HeadyBrosevelt
the Verde River
Member since Jan 2013
21591 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:42 am to
DSLRs are on their way out.

Go mirrorless with a Sony A7s or Panasonic GH4
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18856 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:45 am to
quote:

DSLRs are on their way out.

Go mirrorless with a Sony A7s or Panasonic GH4


Seriously considered it, but I like being able to use my viewfinder in low light.

Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
25568 posts
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:46 am to
I use a Pentax but if I was going to start all over, I would get a Nikon.

You should also review any lens you are considering on the link below. The site has fantastic lens reviews.

Photozone
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram