- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DNA expert, NAACP weigh in on evidence in Maddison Brooks case
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:37 am to GreenRockTiger
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:37 am to GreenRockTiger
quote:
I am calm, answer the question
You asked a bad question.
As I said before (a few times), whatever those reports reflect is one piece of evidence. The lack of DNA is another. The jury has to weigh them.
You're asking a leading question about finding the truth of that incident. I have said multiple times I'm only discussing this in terms of the litigation/prosecution.
Again, calm down. Stop being so emotional. And ask better questions if you want to legitimately participate in the discussion.
1
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You seem way too emotional for this discussion
I mean, youre the one taking this to histrionic levels.
Everyone here is aware that a lack of DNA evidence can make it harder to convict but that does nothing to differentiate between forced and consensual.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:38 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I mean, youre the one taking this to histrionic levels.
Which post, Rog?
quote:
Everyone here is aware that a lack of DNA evidence can make it harder to convict but that does nothing to differentiate between forced and consensual.
"Forced" isn't really an issue in this case, from what has been reported.
Lack of ability to give consent, is a major issue, but that is not "force".
Consent, however, has nothing to do with a discussion about a lack of DNA evidence.
This post was edited on 7/28/23 at 10:39 am
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Lack of ability to give consent, is a major issue,
What does that have to do with DNA evidence?
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What does that have to do with DNA evidence?
I actually just added that to my post.
No idea why you brought up force, for this reason.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:40 am to pizota13
Pull out or condom?
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Consent, however, has nothing to do with a discussion about a lack of DNA evidence.
Then why are you claiming its a difficult case without DNA? Are you suggesting that theres no proof any physical contact occurred?
If they claim its consensual, why would DNA matter?
This post was edited on 7/28/23 at 10:43 am
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:43 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Then why are you claiming its a difficult case without DNA?
Because there are issues with proving penetration, which is a required part of rape.
quote:
Are you suggesting that theres no proof any physical contact occurred?
No. That isn't the burden.
The defense just has to argue that one reasonable alternative scenario can exist, other than the one the prosecution relies on. They don't have to prove anything.
This post was edited on 7/28/23 at 10:43 am
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:43 am to Deactived
quote:
and one of the men, Kaivon Washington, told the Investigative Unit while on his way to jail that he had sex with the woman.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You seem way too emotional for this discussion.
Calm down and ask a better question.
i.e. She asked one you don't have a flip answer to.
"Uh, sit right down Little Lady and calm yourself."
What a fricking piece of shite. You are disgusting.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:48 am to rhar61
quote:
i.e. She asked one you don't have a flip answer to.
Bad timing. I already did.
quote:
What a fricking piece of shite. You are disgusting.
quote:
You seem way too emotional for this discussion.
Calm down
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I’m not emotional - and there is no such thing as a bad question - putting your subjective opinion on a question is quite - emotional
Stop being so emotional. And ask better questions if you want to legitimately participate in the discussion.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. That isn't the burden.
The defense just has to argue that one reasonable alternative scenario can exist,
DNA isn't going to matter as much as you pretend in this thread.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:55 am to GreenRockTiger
quote:
putting your subjective opinion on a question is quite - emotional
He's in that rut and refuses to get out. His tactic is to drag you in the rut with him.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:58 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He's in that rut and refuses to get out. His tactic is to drag you in the rut with him.
he needs to review his tactics Posted on 7/28/23 at 10:59 am to GreenRockTiger
quote:
he needs to review his tactics
Hes been using the same ones for at least a decade. It definitely could use a freshening.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 11:13 am to GreenRockTiger
quote:
and there is no such thing as a bad question
I said ask better questions. I never said it was a "bad" question.
quote:
putting your subjective opinion on a question is quite - emotional
This isn't even true
Posted on 7/28/23 at 11:14 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
DNA isn't going to matter as much as you pretend in this thread.
Doubtful.
Remember, all they have to do is sway 1/12 jurors to prevent a conviction. This wasn't a straightforward case with an easy conviction WITH the DNA evidence.
This post was edited on 7/28/23 at 11:15 am
Posted on 7/28/23 at 11:15 am to pizota13
Didn’t one of the defense attorneys already publicly state that the sex was consensual? He made this statement prior to the release of her BAC.
Posted on 7/28/23 at 11:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
. I never said it was a "bad" question.
Yes you did:
quote:
You asked a bad question.
Nanny nanny booby booby
quote:subjectivity is ruled by what? Facts (haha)??
This isn't even true
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News