- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:46 pm to LSUfan4444
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:46 pm to LSUfan4444
quote:
I want the patient to have the option then let the market figure it out. I know though.....Those codes!!!!
Yea elderly, poor, uneducated people will really be able to figure it out. Even when you describe the difference between an optometrist and an Ophthalmologist to them they Don't understand what it means. You are only thinking from your perspective. shite, if the optometrist would wear green coats and call themselves optometrists they could have access to all the codes they want. The problem is they are trying to be deceptive.
Let the market sort it out? What is granny going to do when the optometrist screws up her cataract surgery and he tells her it was just a normal.complication? She's going to lobby the Congress?
Why do we have regulations at all. Let's let everyone build bridges, fly planes, pilot river boats. The market will sort it out if there are any accidents
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:48 pm to LATigerdoc
you don't have to see an OD for anything medical, but why do you care if I do?
Except of course for your fellow MDs who don't want those office visits going elsewhere?
You can still see an Ophalmologist for every visit you chose.
Except of course for your fellow MDs who don't want those office visits going elsewhere?
You can still see an Ophalmologist for every visit you chose.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:49 pm to Womski
1) let me eternally repeat there are really not general practice physicians any more. Educate yourself on medicine and training. They do residencies and specialize in FM, peds, IM or obgyn
2) a lot of those people are pretty high up in the class. A few of the smartest people I've ever met did IM
3) optometrists are not medical doctors and they are not primary eye doctors and the calling themselves doctor part is somewhat confusing and not entirely straightforward or transparent for the patient
2) a lot of those people are pretty high up in the class. A few of the smartest people I've ever met did IM
3) optometrists are not medical doctors and they are not primary eye doctors and the calling themselves doctor part is somewhat confusing and not entirely straightforward or transparent for the patient
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:50 pm to Womski
quote:
Womski
You have proven more then once that you are a complete clown, and everytime you post I can't help but think you are just trolling. GTFO
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:51 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Lol...so now the MDs were fighting the good fight over those codes for the elderly and poor.
Holy frick!!! How slanted are you guys?
Holy frick!!! How slanted are you guys?
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:52 pm to LSUfan4444
A primary eye doctor is a general ophthalmologist who did not do extra fellowship training after residency. This is not a hard concept.
A primary mental health doctor is a general psychiatrist
A primary mental health doctor is a general psychiatrist
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:53 pm to LATigerdoc
Well, this is Obama's America. Everybody should be able to be a doctor, and everybody should be able to wear a full-length white coat and prescribe meds and do surgeries. Check your privilege, bro.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:53 pm to LSUfan4444
quote:
If the majority of systems allowed PCPs to practic genral medicine the way it should be practiced this shite wouldn't be so desired.
I'm confused by what you mean by this.
My understanding: folks like me (and from what I know of them, Smackoverhawg and Bleeding Purple) are weird. Practicing primary care in rural areas isn't desirable because people like living in cities. Cities don't have primary care shortages with the exception of very poor uninsured, non-Medicaid folks. So if this really were about patient care, it would absolutely tie them into those two demographics. But when we talk about quality of care, they want fewer restrictions. One of the arguments that was made by their side was that collaborative agreements were sometimes unreasonably expensive (namely when the physician was taking a big risk on a so-so to low-quality NO, but that's another story in and of itself). The LAFP lobby actually approached the NP lobby and offered to change policy to where the physician could not charge for the collaborative service agreement at all. The NP lobby refused it flat out. That tells me all I need to know about which group has patient care first on its mind.
quote:
The patient (from a provider side) has taken a back seat to profit.
As a provider, I'll have to disagree. One reason I refuse to be someone else's employee is that medicine is a crappy business. I don't want a boss who's a non-physician dictating the number of patients I need to see or the services I need to offer, because on the human level, it's inappropriate. When medicine is run as a business, you get what you describe. That's something that a lot of folks are turning to, but in rural areas (where they want to "help,") I'd wager the majority of folks are still self employed, taking care of people, and letting the dollars that roll in be enough rather than concerning them self about the dollars rolling in at the cost of good care.
I know of multiple guys who are working in underserved populations who refuse to comply with Medicare standards costing them ~2% of their Medicare reimbursement. That makes them sound like bad guys, until you realize that what Medicare wants us to do is, after we've done complete documentation of everything, buy an EMR that includes check boxes for the patient's BMI, whether you documented a plan for their BMI, if they're smoking, what their meds are, etc. Again, these things are already documented elsewhere, but they want it documented in a second, specific section. This takes time. Over the volume of patients rolling through in a day, it was costing some guys as many as 2-3 patient encounters. So they quit doing it, because it adds nothing to their patients' care, cost them some of their reimbursement from Medicare, but they're able to see an additional 2-3 patients because of it.
Where I'm at now is a hospital-run clinic.
I think you'd be pleasantly surprised if you saw some rural privately-owned offices and groups in practice and see the amount of money "thrown away" from things that would optimize them from a business standpoint but hurt patient care.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:55 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
So those are brand new additions to the original bill. Hot off the press. How are you involved with the legislature? Not bad, it's a step in the right direction. Atleast they are addressing the issues. I would still like to see a longer collaboration period that has some standardized training and milestones to pass.... That part seems very vague
Well I think it was added in the Senate on 4/11 before it was sent to the House.
I'm not involved with the legislature. I just recently started paying attention and decided to read the bill a few days ago and put my two cents in.
Yeah they are trying to improve this bill. I agree with you that many parts of this bill are vague and open to interpretation. I definitely think their needs to be some sort of additional boards for independently practicing as an NP. Also I'd like to know more about how the Board of Nursing is going to monitor the implementation of the program and not just receive a written report at the end of 3 years...
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:55 pm to LSUfan4444
There is no arguing with an MD (or one who aspires to be), the only option is outlasting them. No matter what you say, in the end and in their mind they are above you, they are right and you are wrong.
I will support patient options because MDs are the most self serving group of professionals I have ever dealt with in my entire life. if they won't come out on top, it's wrong.
I will support patient options because MDs are the most self serving group of professionals I have ever dealt with in my entire life. if they won't come out on top, it's wrong.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:56 pm to LSUfan4444
You left the th out of the word.
More power to you if u wanna have them manage your cavernous sinus fistula. Whatever floats your boat
More power to you if u wanna have them manage your cavernous sinus fistula. Whatever floats your boat
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:56 pm to LSUfan4444
quote:
frick the patient and whether or not it's best to get their annual done at the same time as something medical. Credential competent physicians and let the market sort it through.
Here's the thing- who's credentialing them? In both cases, they refuse to be under the jurisdiction of the state medical board. They are part of boards that hold them to inferior standards
Should they include that they are held to inferior standards when they market themselves to consumers? Should they be credentialed under one set of standards? Or should we just let people who aren't involved in the healthcare field make decisions with limited information because they'll trust anyone with a white coat?
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:57 pm to Blob Fish
Right, u didn't build that
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:59 pm to LSUfan4444
What about a 5'3 overweight mild asthmatic who works at the pizza pit
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:59 pm to LSUfan4444
quote:
As you know, mid level reimbursement is lower than physician reimbursement.
The amount of money they receive from the patient is identical.
Posted on 5/20/16 at 12:00 am to LATigerdoc
What does a patient lose by the passing of this bill?
Posted on 5/20/16 at 12:01 am to Bmath
quote:
Oh wow. Look, like it or not Optometrists ARE primary care eye doctors. Do you think they do nothing but refractions in school? First semester is the left eye? Second semester is the right eye?
I'll tell you what I KNOW they don't do
Take call
See emergency patients
See hospital inpatients
Learn basic surgical technique
See complex cases (because they are all referred to an Ophthalmologist)
Interact with other physician specialties
But I guess none of that is important
Posted on 5/20/16 at 12:01 am to Womski
Is this real life? Where did you learn that nursing school is harder than medical school? I'm having some trouble with that one
Posted on 5/20/16 at 12:02 am to Hopeful Doc
Ariana[quote]
The amount of money they receive from the patient is identical[/quotes]
Patient responsibility has nothing to do with reimbursement. Of someone else gets paid less than you to do the same thing, it's gotte be scary.
The amount of money they receive from the patient is identical[/quotes]
Patient responsibility has nothing to do with reimbursement. Of someone else gets paid less than you to do the same thing, it's gotte be scary.
Popular
Back to top


1




