Started By
Message

Convicted cop's election to civil service board questioned

Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:31 am
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:31 am
LINK


A Baton Rouge police officer who was found guilty of using excessive force by a federal jury now has been given the power to decide on the public’s complaints against police.

Corporal Robert Moruzzi was elected to the Baton Rouge Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board more than once after the trial. The 9News Investigators learned the same board gave Cpl. Moruzzi his job back after a former police chief fired him.
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:32 am to
He knocked out that guys front teeth!
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
COINTELPRO Fan
Member since May 2012
55554 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:37 am to

This post has been marked unreadable!

Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19693 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:40 am to
quote:

Convicted cop's election to civil service board questioned


quote:

Percle was never arrested or charged with anything. Percle took Moruzzi, BRPD, and the East Baton Rouge City-Parish to federal court. The jury found Moruzzi liable of using excessive force during that raid and ordered the city-parish to pay Percle $25,000. The attorney’s fees and court costs, footed by the taxpayers, reached over $75,000.


So is he a convicted cop? Or is he a cop that a civil judgment was rendered against? Two different things WAFB.
This post was edited on 4/27/18 at 7:41 am
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:42 am to
Probably was the only way to expose the guy, how do you think he would be able to have him criminally charged?

I think I remember this story from before and that BRPD wouldn't even open an internal affairs complaint about it.
This post was edited on 4/27/18 at 7:45 am
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19693 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Probably was the only way to expose the guy, how do you think he would be able to have him criminally charged?


By stating that he had civil judgments rendered against him for using excessive force. If there is no criminal proceedings, the term convicted should not be used.
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:45 am to
I'm sure he had no way to proceed criminally and that was the only alternative. These things get swept under the rug.

Do you really think BRPD or EBRDA would arrest or charge him? Gee whiz
This post was edited on 4/27/18 at 7:52 am
Posted by JG77056
Vegas baby, Vegas
Member since Sep 2010
12060 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:50 am to
Okay Johnny Semantics
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19693 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Okay Johnny Semantics


It's not semantics at all. One is criminal prosecution...the other is civil. And two different burdens of proof. I'm not saying the officer is a choir boy but it's a huge difference.
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:52 am to
Who do you think would arrest him? His own department? Really?
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19693 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Who do you think would arrest him? His own department? Really?


Maybe...maybe not. But criminal charges could be brought by a DA or by the AG. So are the two BR officers that killed Alton Sterling convicted too? I'm just wondering.
This post was edited on 4/27/18 at 7:56 am
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171035 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:59 am to
That's besides the point. Civil judgment isn't conviction so the title is misleading.
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 7:59 am to
It means nothing because no law enforcement agency is going to arrest law enforcement except in very rare cases. The only way to make it known would be civilly.
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 8:02 am to
I understand what you mean but it was probably the only option for the victim in this case to show this cops behavior. He's lucky he was able to get an attorney.
This post was edited on 4/27/18 at 8:06 am
Posted by stillplayswithcars
Member since Jan 2018
183 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 8:02 am to
Exactly.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171035 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 8:03 am to
quote:

but it was probably the only option for the victim in this case to show this cops behavior.



I don't disagree there. I was just explaining the confusion.
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 9:05 am to
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 9:31 am to
LINK

Same cop:

In 2008, Baton Rouge Police Officer Robert Moruzzi was reportedly off duty at a bar in downtown Baton Rouge when he allegedly got drunk and hit someone. After that, Chief Jeff LeDuff, fired him. But that decision was overturned by the civil service board and instead Moruzzi got a 90 day suspension.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48294 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Probably was the only way to expose the guy, how do you think he would be able to have him criminally charged?

I think I remember this story from before and that BRPD wouldn't even open an internal affairs complaint about it.


Two very different standards in criminal and civil law. It is much easier to find someone liable for an action than to convict them of a crime.
Posted by brbengalgal
Member since Aug 2010
3884 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 9:36 am to
Especially if no one is going to pursue criminal charges! That is the whole point
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram