Started By
Message

re: Charlie Gard has died

Posted on 7/28/17 at 6:45 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111288 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 6:45 pm to
So, to sum this all up, if the government said your kid had no chance to be healed and would die while other doctors felt there was still hope, you'd just accept it and move on, right?

No need to fight it based on everything you've said, correct?
This post was edited on 7/28/17 at 6:46 pm
Posted by SamuelClemens
Earth
Member since Feb 2015
11727 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 7:15 pm to
Sad for the family. It sickens me the people who profit off desperate parents who will pay any price to save their child.
Posted by SamuelClemens
Earth
Member since Feb 2015
11727 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

What the US doctor did was despicable and unethical to give Charlie's parents false hope without fully reviewing the case.
Posted by Vegas Eddie
The Quad
Member since Dec 2013
5981 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 7:16 pm to
The fact that the courts are involved in this type of decision is extremely troubling
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

That's so fricked up. This is the socialized medicine people are begging for in this country.


Yeah. How awful that a child with brain damage got a free year of care on the British taxpayers. The Lord intended medical needs to be profitable.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111288 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Yeah. How awful that a child with brain damage got a free year of care on the British taxpayers. The Lord intended medical needs to be profitable.

Just stay blind to all the details, that's the ticket!!!
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Just stay blind to all the details, that's the ticket!!!



Details like what? His parents wanted him to be a medical experiment and his doctors said no? Holier than thou types are the only ones upset. The Terry Schiavo crowd that wanted to take personal freedoms from America about a decade ago.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84488 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

CaptainBrannigan


Another clown enters the thread.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14920 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

wanted him to be a medical experiment


What. The. Actual. frick...

They wanted to pursue experimental treatment only because of the lack of established treatment. It's not like they wanted him to be a lab rat, they just wanted to take any shot to save him, no matter how unlikely!
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111288 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

Details like what? His parents wanted him to be a medical experiment and his doctors said no?
7 other doctors and 2 international hospitals disagreed with the government's doctors.

The same hospital who said he had no chance and he was basically stuck there tried to file a motion based on "fresh evidence" they found, but in the end, they ran some tests and decided it was too late to go on with that fresh evidence. The months and months this thing drug on could very well have been the difference between that hospital deciding to go ahead with the new evidence and then it being too late.

Let me guess, none of that matters, right?
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131569 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:56 pm to
So much for U.K. Having open borders.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram