- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Are you addicted to posting on forums?
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:48 pm
Hi scholars of the OT,
I was reading Scientific Weekly the other day and found a very interesting article relating to Forums and those who post on it. There was a study done on posters compared to posters of different types of boards to see if there were any differences in how the mind functioned (based on addiction, reward patterns, etc.). Well, the experiment was actually very simple and very interesting and I'm not exactly sure how the experiment gave the researchers the results they were looking for. Anyways, I wanted to see if you guys would pass the experiment.
Apparently, they gave the posters a list of words and they had to find the opposite of those words and time it. The result: Most posters rated poorly. I'll have to look back at the article to see what that means about how badly they are addicted, but I want to know if you all can do it.
Look at the words below and write in the opposite of each word. Time how long it takes:
1. Always
2. Coming
3. From
4. Take
5. Me
6. Down
Good luck everybody and leave your answers in a post below! Let's show Scientific Weekly that we're smarter than they give us credit for!
I was reading Scientific Weekly the other day and found a very interesting article relating to Forums and those who post on it. There was a study done on posters compared to posters of different types of boards to see if there were any differences in how the mind functioned (based on addiction, reward patterns, etc.). Well, the experiment was actually very simple and very interesting and I'm not exactly sure how the experiment gave the researchers the results they were looking for. Anyways, I wanted to see if you guys would pass the experiment.
Apparently, they gave the posters a list of words and they had to find the opposite of those words and time it. The result: Most posters rated poorly. I'll have to look back at the article to see what that means about how badly they are addicted, but I want to know if you all can do it.
Look at the words below and write in the opposite of each word. Time how long it takes:
1. Always
2. Coming
3. From
4. Take
5. Me
6. Down
Good luck everybody and leave your answers in a post below! Let's show Scientific Weekly that we're smarter than they give us credit for!
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:49 pm to IT_Dawg
Yesssss! I'm fricking addicted
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:50 pm to IT_Dawg
I'm on stage 7 now dammit....HELP
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:51 pm to steeltiger17
1. Baw
2. Baw
3. Baw
4. Baw
5. Baw
6. Baw
2. Baw
3. Baw
4. Baw
5. Baw
6. Baw
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:51 pm to steeltiger17
Never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down.....
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:52 pm to OneMoreTime
Much like every other thread he's made
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:53 pm to Titus Pullo
nvm. i'm stupid.
This post was edited on 8/17/16 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:53 pm to IT_Dawg
Yes and it's ruining my up votes
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:55 pm to steeltiger17
quote:
Are you addicted to posting on forums?
You sound like my girlfriend.
"Blah blah Tigerdroppings is all you care about"
"Why don't you show me any attention"
"Stop hitting on my sister"
What is it with you people??
Posted on 8/17/16 at 7:56 pm to Peazey
Damn I missed it before your edit.
Popular
Back to top

17









