Started By
Message

re: Another math thread: "In dog beers I've only had one" doesn't make sense

Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:15 pm to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29001 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

You have the saying wrong.
Nah, YOU have it wrong.
quote:

When I ask you how old your dog is and you say 7, one of us would then say, “so he’s 49 in dog years.”

And one of you would be wrong. He's 7 dog years old, because he's a dog. He's ~49 human years old.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

If the dog lives to 1 human year, it is 7 dog years.

And here is where you go wrong.


, thank you.

It's a circular argument. A 7 year old dog is 7 in dog years and 49 in human years. Trying to say a dog is 7 years old and 49 in dog years is circular.

A 1 year old dog is 7 in human years. A 7 year old human is 1 in dog years.
This post was edited on 5/20/19 at 5:20 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

This is a great thread


I reallllllly want pride or lnchbox to chime in.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29001 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

And I am going to pretend like it's always been that way
It has always been that way, it's just that people are dumb and have been getting it backwards.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171891 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:19 pm to
Jesus Christ, this thread really got stupid.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Jesus Christ, this thread really got stupid.


You gonna take a stand or just keep taking cheap shots from the gallery.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86584 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Preposterous. She's equivalent to a 10 year old dog
Bro those 10 years are still in people years
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171891 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:23 pm to
Sure. OP is right, but the saying is just a cute saying to sell shirts or make memes.

The notion a 1 year old dog is 7 human years old made me laugh though.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29001 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Nope. You have to use your brain to understand this one...
Agreed.
quote:

the term “dog years” is used to imply how old the dog would be in human years, theoretically.
That's how it's used, yes, but it's not used correctly. If you want to tell a dog's age in dog years, then there is no conversion. It's just the number of times he's been around the sun.

Same goes if you want to know a human's age in human years. That one's pretty easy, right? How old is a 7 year old human in human years? Well, he's fricking 7. How old is a 7 year old dog in dog years? fricking 7. A conversion is only necessary if you want to know a human in dog years, or a dog in HUMAN years.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171891 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Same goes if you want to know a human's age in human years. That one's pretty easy, right? How old is a 7 year old human in human years? Well, he's fricking 7. How old is a 7 year old dog in dog years? fricking 7. A conversion is only necessary if you want to know a human in dog years, or a dog in HUMAN years.


Dude. It's a simple tool just used to put into context how old a dog really is. It shouldn't be this serious of a debate.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29001 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

The notion a 1 year old dog is 7 human years old made me laugh though.
Why? It's absolutely correct.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86584 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:30 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/20/19 at 5:30 pm
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171891 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

Why? It's absolutely correct.


A dog after 1 year is 1 year in human years.

In order to put into context what that means in respect to the aging of dogs, people created "dog years" to simplify it. After 1 year, a dog is 7 "in dog years" because they age differently than humans.

This is such an asinine argument and some of you are just being ridiculous just to argue.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89684 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

The notion a 1 year old dog is 7 human years old made me laugh though.


Dog life span - 4015 days (11*365)

Human life span - 28105 days (77*365)

For a dog relative to a human, everything is 1/7th. For a human relative to a dog, everything is 7x.


So, if you hooked up with 70 females in your total life span, how many would a dog need to match you?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29001 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Dude. It's a simple tool just used to put into context how old a dog really is. It shouldn't be this serious of a debate.
It should be simple, and agreed there shouldn't be a debate. But OP started this thread just absolutely certain that he was correct, but he's not. If we just let it go, then people will keep using "dog years" wrong.


We're converting the dog's age to human years, so we should be saying that a dog is "X human years" old. What if we were converting a dog's age to cat years? Would you still say he's "X dog years" old, or would it make more sense to say he's "X cat years" old?

If you convert a foot to a meter, are you still going to use feet as your unit after converting?
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171891 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

We're converting the dog's age to human years, so we should be saying that a dog is "X human years" old. What if we were converting a dog's age to cat years? Would you still say he's "X dog years" old, or would it make more sense to say he's "X cat years" old?

If you convert a foot to a meter, are you still going to use feet as your unit after converting?


This isn't a unit conversion.

It's a cutesy way to explain to your kid why their puppy died after 15 years and they will live to 80+.

This is by far the most ridiculous argument I've ever been a part of on this website.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86584 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

That's not what I asked. I asked how old a 70 year old woman was in dog years, and the answer to that is 10.
Dude, that 10 you keep using is ALSO people years.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29001 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

A dog after 1 year is 1 year in human years.

In order to put into context what that means in respect to the aging of dogs, people created "dog years" to simplify it. After 1 year, a dog is 7 "in dog years" because they age differently than humans.

This is such an asinine argument and some of you are just being ridiculous just to argue.
You need to take a step back, reset, and just consider for a moment that what you're saying doesn't make any sense.

Just accept this simple fact: a 1 (earth) year old dog is 1 dog year old. Because he's a dog. A year is a year. Just like a 1 (earth) year old human is 1 human year old. We aren't making any equivalencies yet.

If we do want to convey an approximate equivalency in body aging, then we would have to express the dog's age in human years, or the human's age in dog years.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29001 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

This isn't a unit conversion.
But it is.
quote:

This is by far the most ridiculous argument I've ever been a part of on this website.
And you are on the wrong side of it.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171891 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 5:44 pm to
I'm out. This is far too autistic for me.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram