- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1990 US Desert Storm armed forces vs 2025 US armed forces: Who wins?
Posted on 8/14/25 at 11:34 am to Volvagia
Posted on 8/14/25 at 11:34 am to Volvagia
quote:
Why do you believe C-RAM would be useless against them? It would be out of the traditional context but I can see them being useful in adapted tactics.
C-RAM’s weren’t developed until the early 2000’s and the C-RAM’s from that era aren’t nimble enough to handle drone swarms, anyway.
This post was edited on 8/14/25 at 11:35 am
Posted on 8/14/25 at 11:48 am to SECCaptain
quote:
US SOF suffered 100 casualties >70% rate in 24 hours fighting a horde of guerilla insurgents with little to no training/coordination in an urban firefight, so yes I would say that's laying waste and is highly relevant to this thread as it demonstrates what can happen when tech/air superiority is neutralized/negated. Many of the Somali belligerents didn't even know how to properly fire a weapon, how would you value an SNA "soldier" relative to a counterpart in the US special forces, yet they achieved what was borderline unconditional surrender given the UN's retreat and near immediate evacuation of the region thereafter
To be fair, at some point, numbers matter. If you have 10,000 untrained militia who aren’t very good at shooting concentrated on a small area, they don’t need to be that good. Slinging 10s or 100’s of thousands of poorly aimed rounds, especially at close range will hit something. A poorly aimed round will kill just as much as a well aimed one.
Posted on 8/14/25 at 12:17 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
To be fair, at some point, numbers matter. If you have 10,000 untrained militia who aren’t very good at shooting concentrated on a small area, they don’t need to be that good. Slinging 10s or 100’s of thousands of poorly aimed rounds, especially at close range will hit something. A poorly aimed round will kill just as much as a well aimed one.
once again, if the mission had been to wipe out 10,000 untrained militia concentrated in a small area, there would have been 10,000 dead Somalis and no American casualties. i dont understand why this battle is even being discussed in this thread, it is entirely irrelevant.
Posted on 8/14/25 at 1:56 pm to Sam Quint
quote:Not only does it make no sense in the context of this discussion but it would be a bad take in a thread specifically about Mogadishu. Air superiority (which we had) doesn't allow you to bomb or deliver effective CAS in densely populated civilian areas on what's supposed to be a 'humanitarian' mission.
once again, if the mission had been to wipe out 10,000 untrained militia concentrated in a small area, there would have been 10,000 dead Somalis and no American casualties. i dont understand why this battle is even being discussed in this thread, it is entirely irrelevant.
Most of the mistakes that led to the battle and how it played out were institutional: mission creep from 'peacekeeping' to aggressive enforcement, denial of requested assets (AC-130's, tanks, armored vehicles) needed for aggressive enforcement for fear of political blowback, almost zero contingency planning (specifically in regards to a downed aircraft and QRF), and a severe lack of respect for both the size and experience of a militia which had already been engaged in urban combat in the same area for months (which he ironically does himself by referring to them as a street gang).
This post was edited on 8/14/25 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 8/14/25 at 2:04 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
once again, if the mission had been to wipe out 10,000 untrained militia concentrated in a small area, there would have been 10,000 dead Somalis and no American casualties. i dont understand why this battle is even being discussed in this thread, it is entirely irrelevant.
My bad. I kinda got you mixed up with the idiot who said they “laid waste” to the US forces
Posted on 8/14/25 at 2:09 pm to Sam Quint
i said win not wipe out .reading is fundamental 
Posted on 8/14/25 at 7:31 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
My bad. I kinda got you mixed up with the idiot who said they “laid waste” to the US forces
No worries
Posted on 8/14/25 at 7:32 pm to 2quik
quote:
i said win not wipe out .reading is fundamental
My statement stands
Popular
Back to top

0







