- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: why do some of you think the new rules detracts from our SB?
Posted on 3/26/10 at 10:59 pm to SuperCrazy
Posted on 3/26/10 at 10:59 pm to SuperCrazy
quote:
our SB?
yes, I always say "we" won the SB. I think a lot of die hard Saints fans talk that way. I hear a lot lf LSU fans here in BR talk that way - "We won".."we suck", etc.
Posted on 3/26/10 at 11:25 pm to LSUTANGERINE
There's nothing wrong with saying "we" with ur favorite team. I believe its "our" Superbowl too
Posted on 3/27/10 at 2:27 am to TexasTiger6777
5 turnovers was the real story of the vikings loss
Saints won the game by the rules that were in place.
Would the rule have been proposed and passed if Minn won the toss and scored? I can only believe that the next playoff game decided in the fashion that the saints won would have prompted the rule. As someone mentioned they were already rumblings about it for some time previous to the actual event
Saints won the game by the rules that were in place.
Would the rule have been proposed and passed if Minn won the toss and scored? I can only believe that the next playoff game decided in the fashion that the saints won would have prompted the rule. As someone mentioned they were already rumblings about it for some time previous to the actual event
Posted on 3/27/10 at 3:54 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I have seen more than just a few comments here than it "takes away or slights Saints SB, or implications of the same. Such statements are very Rant-like. Folks this rule does nothing of the sort.
Yet you state later it's in the eyes of the beholder.
It very easily can be argued for both sides. I do find it extremely convenient that magically all that talk suddenly culminates in a rule change the same year where Brett Favre happened to lose a very crucial game to ice his career off in style. Just saying.
Posted on 3/27/10 at 6:40 pm to jdrumdog
Just watched the coverage of the O.T. debate on NFL network.
Sorry, but still don't understand why they've changed it. Interesting commentary by Zygi from the Vikings (the owner) on why he didn't vote for it.....and you know, kudos to him. He completely nailed it on why the rule should've stayed as it used to be.
I was impressed with his clarity.
Sorry, but still don't understand why they've changed it. Interesting commentary by Zygi from the Vikings (the owner) on why he didn't vote for it.....and you know, kudos to him. He completely nailed it on why the rule should've stayed as it used to be.
I was impressed with his clarity.
Back to top


1





