- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Whatever it takes
Posted on 3/12/22 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 3/12/22 at 2:13 pm
Sign Watson even if he has a eight game suspension. He's a QB that will win games by himself, and will draw other players to the Saints. He's that special. He's has Michael Vick's wheels, but very accurate.
Posted on 3/12/22 at 2:22 pm to gerard07
“Wins games by himself?” Negative, Ghostrider.
Posted on 3/12/22 at 2:27 pm to gerard07
quote:
He's has Michael Vick's wheels
No he doesn’t
Posted on 3/12/22 at 3:06 pm to gerard07
How do we “sign” him if he’s under contract with another team?
Posted on 3/12/22 at 3:17 pm to oncealurker
quote:
How do we “sign” him if he’s under contract with another team?
How much sensical threads/conversations have you seen here in the last 5 or so years? Reality is an enigma.
Posted on 3/12/22 at 4:02 pm to whodatfan
Reality is an enigma...surrounded by a question... wrapped in a mystery.
So who do we want at QB? Taysom? Trade for Love?
Posted on 3/12/22 at 4:08 pm to gerard07
I do agree he's special...and, you need a pro bowl level qb to win the super bowl.
However, getting him at the expense of having nothing around him seems like a net gain of zero.
However, getting him at the expense of having nothing around him seems like a net gain of zero.
Posted on 3/12/22 at 4:41 pm to DomincDecoco
quote:
However, getting him at the expense of having nothing around him seems like a net gain of zero.
A special team around a nothing QB more promising?
Posted on 3/12/22 at 5:02 pm to gerard07
Yeah I disagree with you.
The reason? Watson lead the Texans to a 4-12 season.
You could put Drew on any team and he’d win 7.
Rodgers would win 8 with any team in the league.
Watson is better than anyone we have currently, but he’s not as good as you say.
The reason? Watson lead the Texans to a 4-12 season.
You could put Drew on any team and he’d win 7.
Rodgers would win 8 with any team in the league.
Watson is better than anyone we have currently, but he’s not as good as you say.
Posted on 3/12/22 at 11:58 pm to goatmilker
Prob same results either way.
Posted on 3/13/22 at 5:48 am to gerard07
Jameis MAY be slightly worse as a QB, but the draft capital we’d have to give up to get Watson would make our team much worse and put us in an untenable financial situation with no sure way to get better through the draft
This post was edited on 3/13/22 at 5:50 am
Posted on 3/13/22 at 9:07 am to Proximo
quote:
Jameis MAY be slightly worse as a QB, but the draft capital we’d have to give up to get Watson would make our team much worse and put us in an untenable financial situation with no sure way to get better through the draft
All very true. But for how long? Can we build a team around Watson quicker than finding a franchise QB as good or better is the question to me.
Popular
Back to top
6









