Started By
Message

re: The devaluing of RB's **UPDATED** Ben Tate would've been a Safety

Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:14 am to
Posted by SnoopALoop
Nashville
Member since Apr 2014
4540 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Paeyton and his RBBC game planning


Peyton/Payton combination?



Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
28553 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:16 am to
holy hell that photo made me laurgh (that's laugh and barf) out loud
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
11079 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 8:20 am to
Very valid points i've been mulling over for some time. The Pass first/happy style is the main impetus for killing the running back...It is cyclical as mentioned and will eventually come back.
I thing the second main reason the back has become a secondary thought is the payday they used to command and being prone to injury and the fizzle factor. Teams had to invest large sums of money to get that marquee tailback and 80% of the time he never lived up to the hype. Then, if you had one that lived up to the hype and his body wasn't durable enough, your investment goes down the drain in 2-3 years. RBBC does allow to spread the wear over a couple of other backs to minimalize injuries and the impact if one does go down.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram