- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Question for more advanced CAP individuals
Posted on 1/7/24 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 1/7/24 at 3:06 pm
Why isn’t CAP relieved completely when trading players? I understand that it’s not, but wondering what issue or work around came about that led to the current structure. To me, you take a player, you take the contract?
Posted on 1/7/24 at 3:10 pm to HangmanPage1
quote:
Why isn’t CAP relieved completely when trading players? I understand that it’s not, but wondering what issue or work around came about that led to the current structure. To me, you take a player, you take the contract?
There are maneuvers you can do to spread out your cap hit. Most of those things end up loading you with dead money. It is so you don't spread out payments to "hide" money from your cap dollars. At least that is my simplified understanding.
This post was edited on 1/7/24 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 1/7/24 at 3:16 pm to HangmanPage1
quote:
To me, you take a player, you take the contract?
to some extent they do, but any guaranteed money is not part of the trade, so that must still be paid to them and it gets counted as part of your cap.
the saints specialty, extending contracts, is the reason we cannnot get rid of players, because we have to pay them even if they are released or traded
Popular
Back to top
2






