- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/14/22 at 9:20 am to FatMan
Of course they have a bone for them. It makes sense from a revenue generation standpoint
They have so much money to gain from an LA franchise succeeding. They have almost no penetration in that market. Think about the level of bandwagon that exists out there for the Lakers. That's what they're looking for, they will make hundreds of millions.
This applies to the NFL as a whole due to RevShare.
They have so much money to gain from an LA franchise succeeding. They have almost no penetration in that market. Think about the level of bandwagon that exists out there for the Lakers. That's what they're looking for, they will make hundreds of millions.
This applies to the NFL as a whole due to RevShare.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 9:49 am to Rand AlThor
The NFL has a vested interest in the Rams succeeding and I think that’s pretty clear. There’s so much money to be made there however LA is a city of transplants and fans already have their fav teams they support. They can push the Rams all they want but at the end of the day they’ll never have the following as other teams.
Posted on 2/14/22 at 10:16 am to Akit1
quote:
it’s a horrible look when the outcome is dictated by how the ref decides to interpret a rule. You can’t be lax on a rule 90% of the game, then decide to enforce it with 2 min left.
When we look at some of the history of these recent NFL Championship games, we do have examples of it going both ways - Refs don't enforce the rules all game but get strict at a decisive moment during a series of plays during which the winning team scores a TD to take the lead late in the game. Then we have the example of, late in the game and at a decisive moment, the Refs suddenly go blind and don't see some calls, and these "no-calls" have a decisive impact on the game.
The NFL must indeed prefer this arrangement because the NFL itself has never directly acknowledged the problem, and certainly the NFL has never bothered to try to solve the "problem". That's why it is reasonable to speculate whether the NFL doesn't see this as a problem.
It's quite suspicious.
Popular
Back to top

0





