- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's go, Seattle!
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:47 pm to Fat Bastard
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:47 pm to Fat Bastard
nm
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:47 pm to GMoney2600
Really don't want to see the Packers sneak in with Rodgers back. If we could keep it the way it is or get the Cowboys or Lions in over Sea or LAR that would be best case.
Good QBs are not good to play in the playoffs.
Good QBs are not good to play in the playoffs.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:50 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
Really don't want to see the Packers sneak in with Rodgers back.
I don't think any NFC team wants that. They have a running game now & might be healthy as a team come playoffs.
Call me crazy, but I seriously think Browns have a shot to beat them next week in Cleveland. Hundley is a question mark (that's putting it lightly) & Cleveland has a good run defense. If Hundley plays like Hundley & the Browns hold on the ball...you never know.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:52 pm to GMoney2600
If we win Thursday I like our chances of getting a top seed
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:52 pm to BilJ
quote:
Told you the Lions were posers bone.
They get handled by any team worth a shite.
No clue.
One of Minny's only two losses. Lost to Minny by 7 in the rematch. Lost to Pitt by 5. Lost to Atl by 4. Lost to Car by 3.
Worst two losses were to us by 14, and Ravens today after all the injuries finally mounted up and Stafford was finally pulled with a hand injury.
You have no fricking clue.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:53 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
Really don't want to see the Packers sneak in with Rodgers back
today was game 6 for the Packers without Rodgers (7 weeks including their bye week)
here's their remaining schedule:
@ Browns
@ Panthers
vs. Vikings
@ Lions
ETA: I'm assuming he's available to return for either the Panthers or Vikings game
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:53 pm to CocoLoco
I want to beat them in their place so damn bad I can't stand it
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:55 pm to rt3
It goes by weeks, not games so he can come back against the Panthers iirc.
And of course their last game without Rodgers would be the worst team in the league.
And of course their last game without Rodgers would be the worst team in the league.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:58 pm to bonethug0108
As I said last time, point me towards their quality wins.
You sure do turn into a pissy little bitch when questioned. I agree with you pretty often but you can’t handle even being slightly questioned
quote:
You have no fricking clue
You sure do turn into a pissy little bitch when questioned. I agree with you pretty often but you can’t handle even being slightly questioned
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:59 pm to CocoLoco
quote:
If we win Thursday I like our chances of getting a top seed
Agreed. I'm assuming the reason we seem to have the tie breaker in most of the scenarios is because we've gone undefeated in division play so far. If we can win this game I see it being very realistic we can finish out that way.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:01 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
And yeah I really want to fricking beat Atlanta in the first game in their new stadium.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:02 pm to BilJ
They beat Minnesota by 7.
They lost to 4 playoff (or borderline in Atl's case) teams by 7 or less.
They lost to us with a hurt Stafford by 14 (though he's been hurt most of the year).
You pick today to try and prove some bullshite point just because they lost big. They've hung in EVERY game they've played until today and have 4 double digit wins.
They lost to 4 playoff (or borderline in Atl's case) teams by 7 or less.
They lost to us with a hurt Stafford by 14 (though he's been hurt most of the year).
You pick today to try and prove some bullshite point just because they lost big. They've hung in EVERY game they've played until today and have 4 double digit wins.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:04 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
I'm assuming the reason we seem to have the tie breaker in most of the scenarios is because we've gone undefeated in division play so far.
Doesn't factor in unless determining position in division.
We have tie breakers because of our SoV(ictory) and SoS(chedule).
Philly is going to lose every tie breaker with those in play because they've played mostly crap teams, and lost to the best two teams they played.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:08 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
They beat Minnesota by 7.
They lost to 4 good teams by 7 or less.
so then one quality win it is then....other wins coming from the Cardinals, Giants, Rodger-less packers, Browns, and the Bears. But hey close losses count for something, right? That is why people slept on them.
why are you so sensitive?
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:10 pm to BilJ
quote:
They get handled by any team worth a shite.
The only teams to handle them were us (to a small degree as it was close at the end) and the Ravens today after Stafford finally had to be pulled.
So what you argued before is completely false.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:13 pm to bonethug0108
Top 7 NFC teams 4 remaining games. Rams, Panthers, Seahawks, & Falcons potentially have a tough road ahead...
Look at the Rams & Seahawks' next 3 games...talk about brutal.
Eagles - 10-2
-@Rams
-@Giants
-Raiders
-Cowboys...possibly with Zeke Elliot
Vikings - 10-2
-@Panthers
-Bengals
-@Packers...possibly with Rodgers
-Bears
Rams - 9-3
-Eagles
-@Seahawks
-@Titans
-49ers
Saints - 9-3
-@Falcons
-Jets
-Falcons
-Bucs
Panthers - 8-4
-Vikings
-Packers...possibly with Rodgers
-Bucs
-@Falcons
Seahawks - 8-4
-@Jaguars
-Rams
-@Cowboys...possibly with Zeke Elliot
-Cardinals
Falcons - 7-5
-Saints
-Bucs
-@Saints
-Panthers
Look at the Rams & Seahawks' next 3 games...talk about brutal.
Eagles - 10-2
-@Rams
-@Giants
-Raiders
-Cowboys...possibly with Zeke Elliot
Vikings - 10-2
-@Panthers
-Bengals
-@Packers...possibly with Rodgers
-Bears
Rams - 9-3
-Eagles
-@Seahawks
-@Titans
-49ers
Saints - 9-3
-@Falcons
-Jets
-Falcons
-Bucs
Panthers - 8-4
-Vikings
-Packers...possibly with Rodgers
-Bucs
-@Falcons
Seahawks - 8-4
-@Jaguars
-Rams
-@Cowboys...possibly with Zeke Elliot
-Cardinals
Falcons - 7-5
-Saints
-Bucs
-@Saints
-Panthers
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 11:19 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:14 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
Who have the Lions beaten that should have people excited about them? They’re very average
this was the original argument
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:23 pm to GMoney2600
I hate to say it but I think we have to root for Carolina to beat Minnesota
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:24 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
Really don't want to see the Packers sneak in with Rodgers back. If we could keep it the way it is or get the Cowboys or Lions in over Sea or LAR that would be best case.
I don't want any part of the cowboys with zeke rolling in the playoffs either. When healthy they were a pretty dynamic team prior to the suspension
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:20 am to St Augustine
Meh. I think we can shut down Zeke. We've kept most backs in check (outside the random one long run here and there once every other game or so).
And Dak doesn't impress me. I think we match with them similar to how we match with Carolina. Shut down the run and make Dak beat us, which he can't without the run game.
And Dak doesn't impress me. I think we match with them similar to how we match with Carolina. Shut down the run and make Dak beat us, which he can't without the run game.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News