- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kamara catch was incomplete. Should have been ruled as so
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:19 am to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:19 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Just a generational run of being wrong
there are just some people who can never admit they're wrong. they convince themselves they're right. its very strange and really sad.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 9:13 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
How are you still doing this
Aren’t you still doing this
Posted on 12/20/24 at 10:13 am to animalcracker
Refs are also stupid and can't be trusted.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:22 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
The ball was moving and needs to be secured when the first foot touched
I disagree but have no real desire to argue since the video tells the story about whether the ball was moving.
I’m asking whether it would be a catch if it was NOT moving before the first foot came down and assuming it didn’t move afterward.
You indicated before you still didn’t think it was a catch.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:33 pm to moneyg
You or anybody else including officials
(Have no idea why everyone on this board is suddenly in love with officiating in the NFL and the replay booth)
Can determine in a fraction of a millisecond that the ball was secure and first foot down
Sorry
Not changing my opinion
And I’ve seen it many times before when it hurt the Saints and other teams
The reason instant replay was created
Was so a bad call couldn’t determine a game
“instant” replay is often as bad as the bad calls on the field
If the exact play happened to the Redskins
The vast majority on this thread would have a different argument
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:49 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
You or anybody else including officials (Have no idea why everyone on this board is suddenly in love with officiating in the NFL and the replay booth) Can determine in a fraction of a millisecond that the ball was secure and first foot down Sorry Not changing my opinion And I’ve seen it many times before when it hurt the Saints and other teams The reason instant replay was created Was so a bad call couldn’t determine a game “instant” replay is often as bad as the bad calls on the field If the exact play happened to the Redskins The vast majority on this thread would have a different argument
You didn’t answer the question.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:55 pm to moneyg
quote:
You didn’t answer the question.
Your attempt to prove the ball was not moving is silly
How can anybody tell in the fraction of a millisecond when his first foot hit the ground
Is totally ludicrous
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:56 pm to moneyg
Same question for you
If the ball was moving…..
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:57 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Your attempt to prove the ball was not moving is silly
I’m not doing that. I don’t think it was moving. You think it was.
I’m asking a hypothetical about whether it would be a catch if you agreed it was not moving.
You seem to be avoiding that question.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:58 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Same question for you If the ball was moving…..
I’ve been very clear.
The process starts when the ball is secure.
If it was moving when the first of two feet came down, it would be incomplete.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:06 pm to moneyg
quote:
I’m not doing that. I don’t think it was moving.
You think it was.
You are avoiding the question
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:09 pm to moneyg
quote:
The process starts when the ball is secure.
How is it possible for the ball to be “secure” in the fraction of a millisecond?
Answer this question please
That is the definition of not being secure
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:15 pm to moneyg
quote:
I’ve been very clear.
The process starts when the ball is secure.
The ball was secure (maybe in slow motion)
It is impossible for the ball to be secure in the fraction of a millisecond
It’s preposterous to think so
Do you think “secure” is touching the ball for the fraction of a millisecond
I don’t think so
Maybe you do
I respect your opinion
I respectfully disagree
I do appreciate your back and forth in a civil way
As opposed to most of the knuckle draggers on this thread
And quite often on this board
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:16 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
How is it possible for the ball to be “secure” in the fraction of a millisecond?
The ball is secure when it last moves in relation to the hand(s).
Every catch ever goes from not secure to secure in a millisecond. That’s when the process begins.
For a catch to happen, there must control (secure) and then two feet or another body part must be in bounds. If the player is going to the ground before a 3rd step, he must survive the ground.
But you still haven’t answered the question. Why are you afraid to do so?
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:23 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
The ball was secure (maybe in slow motion) It is impossible for the ball to be secure in the fraction of a millisecond
I mentioned in another thread that I can’t tell if you are getting confused by semantics or trying to use semantics to confuse the situation and make a point.
The receiver must control the ball to start the process of a catch. That control happens when the ball is no longer moving in relation to the hands or arms or whatever part he gains control with. A ball being bobbled or tipped from one hand to another is not controlled.
A ball squeezed by a hand and not moving in relation to the hand is in control. This is what happened with the Kamara catch.
Now, that’s just the beginning of the process. He must also get two feet down and sometimes needs to survive the ground. But if all that happens after control and the ball stays in control it’s a catch.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 6:21 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
How can anybody tell in the fraction of a millisecond when his first foot hit the ground
All scoring plays are reviewed quickly. It was looked at by New York.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:30 pm to moneyg
quote:
Every catch ever goes from not secure to secure in a millisecond.
That’s when the process begins.
Really
So if you have two feet on the ground at the same time
And at the same time you have the ball “secured” in both hands for a millisecond
Then a defender hits you after the millisecond and the ball comes loose
Is that a catch?
Posted on 12/20/24 at 9:32 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Really
So if you have two feet on the ground at the same time
And at the same time you have the ball “secured” in both hands for a millisecond
Then a defender hits you after the millisecond and the ball comes loose
Is that a catch?
You misunderstand.
I'm not saying the catch occurred in a millisecond. I'm saying the securing of the ball happens in a millisecond. The process begins when the ball is secure. The catch occurs after the process of the catch is completed.
In your example the receiver has to maintain control through the contact and perhaps through the ground unless he can take a 3rd step or make a football move before it is a catch.
In the Kamara example, he never lost the ball. It never moved.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 9:37 am to moneyg
quote:
I'm not saying the catch occurred in a millisecond. I'm saying the securing of the ball happens in a millisecond.
The process begins when the ball is secure. The catch occurs after the process of the catch is completed.
OK
If that’s the rule, then so be it.
Then it’s a bad rule.
It’s impossible to have the ball secured in a millisecond
Therefore the ball wasn’t secured when the first foot touched
Therefore the ball wasn’t secured until the second foot touched
Anyway
A Merry Christmas to you and your family
And I’ll include all the name callers on this thread
Peace
Popular
Back to top
