Started By
Message

re: Kamara catch was incomplete. Should have been ruled as so

Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:19 am to
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
21989 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Just a generational run of being wrong


there are just some people who can never admit they're wrong. they convince themselves they're right. its very strange and really sad.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 9:13 am to
quote:

How are you still doing this



Aren’t you still doing this
Posted by TigerSooner
Member since Nov 2023
3025 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 10:13 am to
Refs are also stupid and can't be trusted.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59343 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

The ball was moving and needs to be secured when the first foot touched


I disagree but have no real desire to argue since the video tells the story about whether the ball was moving.

I’m asking whether it would be a catch if it was NOT moving before the first foot came down and assuming it didn’t move afterward.

You indicated before you still didn’t think it was a catch.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:33 pm to

You or anybody else including officials

(Have no idea why everyone on this board is suddenly in love with officiating in the NFL and the replay booth)

Can determine in a fraction of a millisecond that the ball was secure and first foot down

Sorry

Not changing my opinion

And I’ve seen it many times before when it hurt the Saints and other teams


The reason instant replay was created

Was so a bad call couldn’t determine a game

“instant” replay is often as bad as the bad calls on the field


If the exact play happened to the Redskins
The vast majority on this thread would have a different argument
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59343 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

You or anybody else including officials (Have no idea why everyone on this board is suddenly in love with officiating in the NFL and the replay booth) Can determine in a fraction of a millisecond that the ball was secure and first foot down Sorry Not changing my opinion And I’ve seen it many times before when it hurt the Saints and other teams The reason instant replay was created Was so a bad call couldn’t determine a game “instant” replay is often as bad as the bad calls on the field If the exact play happened to the Redskins The vast majority on this thread would have a different argument


You didn’t answer the question.

Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

You didn’t answer the question.


Your attempt to prove the ball was not moving is silly

How can anybody tell in the fraction of a millisecond when his first foot hit the ground

Is totally ludicrous
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:56 pm to

Same question for you

If the ball was moving…..
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59343 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Your attempt to prove the ball was not moving is silly


I’m not doing that. I don’t think it was moving. You think it was.

I’m asking a hypothetical about whether it would be a catch if you agreed it was not moving.

You seem to be avoiding that question.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59343 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Same question for you If the ball was moving…..


I’ve been very clear.

The process starts when the ball is secure.

If it was moving when the first of two feet came down, it would be incomplete.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

I’m not doing that. I don’t think it was moving.

You think it was.


You are avoiding the question
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

The process starts when the ball is secure.



How is it possible for the ball to be “secure” in the fraction of a millisecond?

Answer this question please

That is the definition of not being secure

Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

I’ve been very clear.

The process starts when the ball is secure.



The ball was secure (maybe in slow motion)
It is impossible for the ball to be secure in the fraction of a millisecond

It’s preposterous to think so

Do you think “secure” is touching the ball for the fraction of a millisecond

I don’t think so

Maybe you do

I respect your opinion

I respectfully disagree

I do appreciate your back and forth in a civil way

As opposed to most of the knuckle draggers on this thread

And quite often on this board
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59343 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

How is it possible for the ball to be “secure” in the fraction of a millisecond?


The ball is secure when it last moves in relation to the hand(s).

Every catch ever goes from not secure to secure in a millisecond. That’s when the process begins.

For a catch to happen, there must control (secure) and then two feet or another body part must be in bounds. If the player is going to the ground before a 3rd step, he must survive the ground.

But you still haven’t answered the question. Why are you afraid to do so?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59343 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

The ball was secure (maybe in slow motion) It is impossible for the ball to be secure in the fraction of a millisecond


I mentioned in another thread that I can’t tell if you are getting confused by semantics or trying to use semantics to confuse the situation and make a point.

The receiver must control the ball to start the process of a catch. That control happens when the ball is no longer moving in relation to the hands or arms or whatever part he gains control with. A ball being bobbled or tipped from one hand to another is not controlled.

A ball squeezed by a hand and not moving in relation to the hand is in control. This is what happened with the Kamara catch.

Now, that’s just the beginning of the process. He must also get two feet down and sometimes needs to survive the ground. But if all that happens after control and the ball stays in control it’s a catch.
Posted by Vinny V
Kenna Brah
Member since Jun 2011
3874 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

How can anybody tell in the fraction of a millisecond when his first foot hit the ground


All scoring plays are reviewed quickly. It was looked at by New York.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

Every catch ever goes from not secure to secure in a millisecond.

That’s when the process begins.


Really

So if you have two feet on the ground at the same time

And at the same time you have the ball “secured” in both hands for a millisecond

Then a defender hits you after the millisecond and the ball comes loose

Is that a catch?


Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
35357 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:52 pm to
fricking retard
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59343 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Really

So if you have two feet on the ground at the same time

And at the same time you have the ball “secured” in both hands for a millisecond

Then a defender hits you after the millisecond and the ball comes loose

Is that a catch?




You misunderstand.

I'm not saying the catch occurred in a millisecond. I'm saying the securing of the ball happens in a millisecond. The process begins when the ball is secure. The catch occurs after the process of the catch is completed.

In your example the receiver has to maintain control through the contact and perhaps through the ground unless he can take a 3rd step or make a football move before it is a catch.

In the Kamara example, he never lost the ball. It never moved.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19425 posts
Posted on 12/21/24 at 9:37 am to
quote:

I'm not saying the catch occurred in a millisecond. I'm saying the securing of the ball happens in a millisecond.


The process begins when the ball is secure. The catch occurs after the process of the catch is completed.



OK
If that’s the rule, then so be it.
Then it’s a bad rule.

It’s impossible to have the ball secured in a millisecond

Therefore the ball wasn’t secured when the first foot touched


Therefore the ball wasn’t secured until the second foot touched

Anyway

A Merry Christmas to you and your family

And I’ll include all the name callers on this thread

Peace
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram