- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jazen Jackson
Posted on 2/21/12 at 9:58 pm to saintsfan22
Posted on 2/21/12 at 9:58 pm to saintsfan22
I'm wasn't bitching about it. Most Strong Safeties aren't good in coverage. We need to strengthen up in other areas which will cover the safeties weakness in coverage.
This post was edited on 2/21/12 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 2/21/12 at 10:00 pm to Hazelnut
I wasn't trying to single you out just piggybacking cause it was the last post.
Posted on 2/22/12 at 6:49 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
worked out with ivory
There is a big difference between spending a pick on a player and signing a player as an undrafted FA.
Posted on 2/22/12 at 8:11 am to saintsfan22
I wouldn't mind taking a Jackson with a 5th or 6th round pick if he is there, but I think another team will overlook his character issues and take him on Day 2.
Posted on 2/22/12 at 8:22 am to TigerAlumni2010
quote:
I wouldn't mind taking a Jackson with a 5th or 6th round pick if he is there
agreed
kid has some major issues, though. he couldn't even make team meetings at mcneese and would disappear for days
Posted on 2/22/12 at 8:23 am to ceto
I hate that im going to say this...
considering our cap situation and the amount of help we need on defense, we really, really, really, (did i mention "really"?) need low risk-high reward players.
He fits that to a T if he's available late. [vomited in mouth a little]
considering our cap situation and the amount of help we need on defense, we really, really, really, (did i mention "really"?) need low risk-high reward players.
He fits that to a T if he's available late. [vomited in mouth a little]
This post was edited on 2/22/12 at 8:24 am
Posted on 2/22/12 at 9:03 am to BobBoucher
As a late round pick Jackson would be worth the gamble. I would rather see them take a chance on Ron Brooks out of LSU instead.
Posted on 2/22/12 at 9:04 am to cuddlemonkey
quote:
There is a big difference between spending a pick on a player and signing a player as an undrafted FA.
i don't see a big risk in taking a player late
Posted on 2/22/12 at 12:28 pm to ceto
If he didn't have such a shitty attitude, I'd love to get him.
Posted on 2/22/12 at 12:34 pm to Ala Tide
What's the risk look at Al Woods? Plus know u don't have to pay as much I think the dude would be a steal
Posted on 2/22/12 at 1:47 pm to ceto
did Janzen Jackson even end up being productive in college ball?
I thought he never panned out even when he was on the field...
I thought he never panned out even when he was on the field...
Posted on 2/22/12 at 2:07 pm to TortiousTiger
Correct me if I am wring but wasn't Nicks coming college had issues that's why he slipped in the draft
Posted on 2/22/12 at 2:08 pm to TortiousTiger
quote:
did Janzen Jackson even end up being productive in college ball? I thought he never panned out even when he was on the field...
He was killing receivers in the back field while at Tennessee
Posted on 2/22/12 at 3:06 pm to Big D of the LC
quote:
Correct me if I am wring but wasn't Nicks coming college had issues that's why he slipped in the draft
Yes but his issues weren't as bad. He was lazy and got arrested for drunk and disorderly once.
Popular
Back to top


1








