Started By
Message

re: Crawley should have been playing

Posted on 9/24/17 at 6:38 pm to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 9/24/17 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Yea he quicky


Talking about Harris? Because he's not. Him, PJ, and Moore have near identical 40s (around 4.55).

Lattimore is our only fast corner and he should have been on Diggs. Allen fricked up.
This post was edited on 9/24/17 at 6:40 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166269 posts
Posted on 9/24/17 at 6:45 pm to
I said quicky
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56514 posts
Posted on 9/24/17 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Crawley should have started over Harris easily.



Agree. It helps when you are covering subpar WRs though.

Still, you can see what our defense could be if our DBs just give us a chance. We need to get Breaux and Lattimore back.
Posted by gregory6592
covington
Member since Mar 2013
632 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 12:29 am to
He must have been benched for discipline cuz that's the only thing that makes sense
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
9960 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 1:03 am to
Who knows if we end up winning one of those two first games with him but Crawley was definitely better than Harris
Posted by Lexman1
Central Louisiana
Member since Oct 2016
2002 posts
Posted on 9/25/17 at 8:47 am to
Crawley was very impressive yesterday. Harris is not a starting caliber cb and should only be used in case of emergency!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram