- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Benson Ok with Vick
Posted on 6/22/09 at 9:05 am to VA LSU fan
Posted on 6/22/09 at 9:05 am to VA LSU fan
quote:
If Brees goes down, I don't think a single honest fan would want Brunell or Harrington instead of Vick as QB.
I'd take Harrington over Vick any day. Give Harrington a good O-Line and some WR's and I bet he'll do good.
1
Posted on 6/23/09 at 8:54 am to Yeh Hun
Problem people tend to forget is that vick has been out of football for 3 years....there's no teling what kind of shape he's in or if he can even return to his old form. therefore, he's definately a gamble wahtever way you look at it.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 9:44 am to bayou2003
quote:I take Harrington or Brunell over Vick. That makes 2.
If Brees goes down, I don't think a single honest fan would want Brunell or Harrington instead of Vick as QB.
I'd take Harrington over Vick any day. Give Harrington a good O-Line and some WR's and I bet he'll do good.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 10:29 am to SJS Eagle 85
quote:
quote:
If Brees goes down, I don't think a single honest fan would want Brunell or Harrington instead of Vick as QB.
I'd take Harrington over Vick any day. Give Harrington a good O-Line and some WR's and I bet he'll do good.
I take Harrington or Brunell over Vick. That makes 2.
I'd take Brunell over Vick right now. He looked good in pre season last year. I'm not so sure about Harrington. I wish we could have gotten a late draft pick to get a QB in this past draft to develop.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 10:36 am to Suntiger
I heard Bobby and Hokie saying that Harrington looked horrible in the OTA's and that he's no better than Palko was.
That's insane if true. I always kinda liked Harrington and saw him play some decent games in Detroit (one was against the Aaron Brooks-led Saints for his first win as a pro).
That's insane if true. I always kinda liked Harrington and saw him play some decent games in Detroit (one was against the Aaron Brooks-led Saints for his first win as a pro).
Posted on 6/24/09 at 9:10 am to Yeh Hun
No way this will happen,our offense is soo far removed from what he brings to the table its not even funny.Much less what the man himself brings to the table........garbage.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 10:41 am to redfish99
why is this thread still going strong? not much else to talk about.. can't wait for preseason.
Posted on 7/30/09 at 10:04 pm to beauchristopher
If the Saints weren't so close to signing him there would be no other team news to discuss
Posted on 7/30/09 at 10:08 pm to blueslover
quote:
If the Saints weren't so close to signing him there would be no other team news to discuss
+1
Posted on 7/30/09 at 10:09 pm to blueslover
quote:
"would not fight it"
nice choice of words.Posted on 7/30/09 at 10:10 pm to oldschoolqb
I don't think he would have a dog in that fight
Posted on 7/30/09 at 10:11 pm to blueslover
blues, be careful! they can ban you for bumping all of these Vick threads. just looking out for ya.
Posted on 7/30/09 at 11:10 pm to Yeh Hun
quote:
dude would come back and still be top 10 most QB's in the league suck
I thought the old saying was: "absence makes the heart grow fonder". After reading some of this Vick crap, the saying should be changed to: "absence makes the mind grow weaker".
Vick has never been a Top 10 quarterback...again, NEVER.
Please explain how 2 years making sure you don't drop the soap makes him a better quarterback then he was before.
This post was edited on 7/30/09 at 11:11 pm
Posted on 7/30/09 at 11:16 pm to BeachDude022
quote:
blues, be careful! they can ban you for bumping all of these Vick threads. just looking out for ya.
would be surprised if they didn't
Posted on 7/31/09 at 12:37 am to Suntiger
quote:
Ummmm, I don't really watch ESPN all that much and I don't know if Vick was ever a top 10 "QB" in his prime. He was the #1 athlete at one point. Had a cannon for an arm, but was so damn inaccurate and always let the play break down instead of just throwing the ball. Sometimes a guy would be wide open and he would just take off and run. That was great for him four years ago. Can he still do that??? Do we even want that when we have Brees???
Yes.
Our 3rd and short and 4th and short conversion percentage would be off the charts with Vick.
Posted on 7/31/09 at 12:41 am to beauchristopher
quote:
why is this thread still going strong? not much else to talk about.. can't wait for preseason.
Our inability to convert 3rd and 1 last year was the difference between us having home field advantage throughout the playoffs and being 8-8.
Washington, Denver, Minnesota, @ Tampa, @ Chicago were all heartbreaking, nailbiting losses because we could not convert 3rd and 36 inches.
Vick would instantly solve that. There would be no way to start a Tebow-esque formation on 3rd and 1 with Vick taking the snap.
This post was edited on 7/31/09 at 12:43 am
Posted on 7/31/09 at 1:47 pm to blueslover
quote:
Benson Ok with Vick
I don't think he would have a dog in that fight
that's just trashy
Posted on 7/31/09 at 10:21 pm to VA LSU fan
quote:Count me as one who does not want Vick- as another poster has already stated, he is not designed for our offense even if he wasn't such an a-hole...
If Brees goes down, I don't think a single honest fan would want Brunell or Harrington instead of Vick as QB.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News