- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brandon Ingram signing with Klutch Sports
Posted on 12/4/24 at 7:57 am to J_Hingle
Posted on 12/4/24 at 7:57 am to J_Hingle
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. I don’t see a reason to extend him, so might as well trade him.
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 7:57 am
1
Posted on 12/4/24 at 8:11 am to J_Hingle
quote:
Trade request coming soon
I was already operating under this assumption. Kinda assumed we all were.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 9:03 am to Soggymoss
quote:
I don’t see a reason to extend him, so might as well trade him.
This team is still losing even with Trey, CJ, and Dejounte back because they have nobody with gravity to free up Trey and CJ. If they are ready to trade Zion, I can see the argument for keeping BI. They need someone defenses will scheme for to free up the role players. Trading both seems like a path to a hard reset.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:02 am to AboveTheRim
quote:
Who has better value , BI or Zach Lavine?
Lavine is a better player on a much worse contract. He has only played 65 games 4 times in 10 years. That's better than Ingram ( 1 time in 8 years), but still ridiculous for 45 million a year. For a contender willing to pay significant tax penalties, Lavine has more value. For a budget franchise, neither has any value at a cost above 30 million a year.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News