3rd Star or Detroit/Toronto/Suns approach for Pels?

With the Pels obviously needing to revamp their roster, the dilemma is which route do they take?

1. Acquire a 3rd star and in turn, have less depth, due to cap restrictions, and hope Griff can draft ready to contribute rookies/sign minimum FA's who can and use the MLE to find fringe starter/6th man who HAS TO outplay his contract; or

2. Utilize that money to build a complete roster with good bench depth like recent champions, Detroit '04, Toronto '19 and how the Suns, Hawks, Clippers, Nuggets, Mavs appear to have become real contenders this year?

Personally, I favor Option 2 for a number of reasons:
1. Cap flexibility
2. Team depth
3. Able to overcome injuries, possibly
4. Able to keep young players who develop into core pieces.
5. Team continuity --not having to retool the roster every year bc of all the 1yr. min. deals
6. Not having to hope quality vets choose the Pels strictly bc of Zion/BI/contender status, despite perceived negative location and market factors

I believe teams are realizing that depth is becoming more important especially bc of Covid and the last two condensed seasons, which has liekly contributed to all the injuries of star players in these playoffs.

Also, both options would require the Pels to draft well, and Griff has not had a good track record in selecting players, no matter the spot selecting in (#1 Bennett bust-- but I dont know if I can say other GM's wouldnt have done the same) but I rather Griff selecting earlier than later, if he's not using "GM" Langdon's supposed exceptional ability in scouting players.

The 3rd star option just has so much less margin of error and requires a considerable amount of luck in terms of injuries, signing vet players who are worth more than minimum contracts and willing to come to N.O. (never has happened), and it becoming mandatory that Griff hit on late 1sts/2nd rd picks who can come in and contribute right away with very few growing pains.