- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/12/13 at 7:54 pm to AlxTgr
Lol. You're right Gotye did get one the other night.
I must have spaced on that one.
ETA: But I still like the Shakes to have a little bit longer lasting run.
I must have spaced on that one.
ETA: But I still like the Shakes to have a little bit longer lasting run.
This post was edited on 2/12/13 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 2/12/13 at 8:09 pm to AlxTgr
Not sure what you're point is in this thread. I can't control who the Grammys award. My prediction was wrong, along with many others..
Gotye will be a fart in the wind, while the shakes will put out more quality music...
Gotye will be a fart in the wind, while the shakes will put out more quality music...
Posted on 2/12/13 at 8:33 pm to TheDoc
No point was attempted. I just found it funny is all. I remember when this was first posted. I don't think I had heard any of the shakes. I had heard gotye's hit. I checked out the shakes just to see. Terrible.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 9:19 pm to TheDoc
Rock
alt rock
college rock
jangle pop
power pop
shoe gaze
alt country
classic country
Among other things
alt rock
college rock
jangle pop
power pop
shoe gaze
alt country
classic country
Among other things
Posted on 2/12/13 at 9:35 pm to AlxTgr
And you don't like the Alabama shakes?
What bands do you like?
What bands do you like?
Posted on 2/12/13 at 9:51 pm to TheDoc
I think GIVERS will be bigger than Alabama Shakes at the end of the day
No Louisiana bias,either. Different styles, yes, but I think GIVERS are better at what they do. Plus their chick is
No Louisiana bias,either. Different styles, yes, but I think GIVERS are better at what they do. Plus their chick is
Posted on 2/12/13 at 9:56 pm to HeadyBrosevelt
Hmm.. I want to agree with you, but I don't think the givers will get that big. Though, they are insanely talented.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:01 pm to TheDoc
quote:
but I don't think the givers will get that big
Beyond their talent, they also have the backing of Neil Young. He wrote about them in his latest book. Also, a song in FIFA is a pretty damn big deal considering it's worldwide distribution.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:54 pm to HeadyBrosevelt
They are a festival band IMO
They'll never win any Grammys, even though they have some good songs.
But they'll make their living playing live.
As far as FIFA goes, royal teeth has a song in there as well and I'd say they are quickly becoming a bigger band than givers with them being on the alt nation too 18 for quite some time now.
Givers never were...
They'll never win any Grammys, even though they have some good songs.
But they'll make their living playing live.
As far as FIFA goes, royal teeth has a song in there as well and I'd say they are quickly becoming a bigger band than givers with them being on the alt nation too 18 for quite some time now.
Givers never were...
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:56 pm to TheDoc
quote:
They'll never win any Grammys, even though they have some good songs.
That doesn't mean shite
quote:
But they'll make their living playing live.
Along with every other band nowadays
quote:
As far as FIFA goes, royal teeth has a song in there as well and I'd say they are quickly becoming a bigger band than givers with them being on the alt nation too 18 for quite some time now.
No
Posted on 2/12/13 at 11:05 pm to HeadyBrosevelt
Royal teeth are on danger bird records and have some serious backing from a lot of industry folks that are behind them.
They are quickly blowing up and have more push than the givers did/do.
Even though givers are on glassnote, you don't really see them getting a whole lot of push.
They are quickly blowing up and have more push than the givers did/do.
Even though givers are on glassnote, you don't really see them getting a whole lot of push.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 11:12 pm to TheDoc
WTF IS JANGLE POP!?!?!?!
I swear you just made that up.
I swear you just made that up.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 11:18 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Jangle pop is a genre of alternative rock from the mid-1980s that "marked a return to the chiming or jangly guitars and pop melodies of the '60s", as exemplified by The Byrds, with electric twelve-string guitars and power pop song structures. Mid-1980s jangle pop was a non-mainstream "pop-based format" with "some folk-rock overtones". Between 1983 and 1987, the description "jangle pop" was, in the US, used to describe bands like R.E.M., Let's Active and Tom Petty, and a subgenre called "Paisley Underground", which incorporated psychedelic influences.[1] In the UK the term was applied to the new wave of raw and immediate sounding melodic guitar-bands collected on the NME's C86 (and later CD86) compilations.
Posted on 2/12/13 at 11:33 pm to TheDoc
Posted on 2/13/13 at 8:44 am to SUB
quote:I'm not surprised you don't know about it
WTF IS JANGLE POP!?!?!?!
I swear you just made that up.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 9:28 am to TheDoc
quote:
They'll never win any Grammys, even though they have some good songs.
Grammys do not mean anything. Other than you made a decent pop song that old people like. The Grammys always trend about 20-30 years behind pop music. Winning one is actually kind of a bad thing. It means you appeal to 50-year-olds.
I've never heard anyone, other than Doc, argue that an artist is quality based upon their Grammy nominations/wins. Ever. No one thinks the Beatles are the best band ever because Sgt. Pepper's won a Grammy (it did, but no one cares).
Popular
Back to top



1




