Started By
Message

re: Which Beatles Were The Most And Least Replaceable?

Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:44 am to
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
19375 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:44 am to
"She Loves Ya, Man"
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95464 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

There's a good chance he's the greatest pop/rock guitarist of all time. He is certainly the best bass player.


I haven't hidden my admiration for Maca on this board, but these are both a bit of a stretch. Paul knew well enough to supplement his own talent with Denny Laine even on the first Wings record. By the second one (Red Rose Speedway), he had Laine AND McCollough, as well as Hugh McCracken and David Spinozza (who had already played with Paul and Linda on Ram) taking guest leads, almost predicting how Steely Dan would operate later in the decade. Paul played what he thought he could to fit the music and brought others in (as the Beatles had late, with Preston, Clapton, etc.) to help as needed.

As a multi-instrumentalist who is also the "frontman" Maca has few peers (Prince, Steve Winwood and a few others - I guess the modern version is Grohl), but to argue he was better on lead guitar than effectively anyone else who played lead on a Wings record or the guys Steely Dan used, much less the virtuosos we can all name is a little bit crazy. Likewise, I like his bass parts with The Beatles more than some bass "purists", but to say he was a better bass player than Entwistle, JPJ, Bootsy, Jack Bruce, Larry Graham, Jaco or even some of the great session players like Jamerson or David Hood? I mean, I think he's the greatest pop songwriter of all time and is (was?) a great lead, rhythm and bass guitarist. But greatest on any of those instruments? I don't think so.



Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12721 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 6:38 pm to
Least replaceable, Stuart Sutcliffe.
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
14545 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 8:41 pm to


(6 minute cut)
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 9:11 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39715 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:58 pm to
quote:


As a multi-instrumentalist who is also the "frontman" Maca has few peers (Prince, Steve Winwood and a few others - I guess the modern version is Grohl), but to argue he was better on lead guitar than effectively anyone else who played lead on a Wings record or the guys Steely Dan used, much less the virtuosos we can all name is a little bit crazy. Likewise, I like his bass parts with The Beatles more than some bass "purists", but to say he was a better bass player than Entwistle, JPJ, Bootsy, Jack Bruce, Larry Graham, Jaco or even some of the great session players like Jamerson or David Hood? I mean, I think he's the greatest pop songwriter of all time and is (was?) a great lead, rhythm and bass guitarist. But greatest on any of those instruments? I don't think so.
Depends on how you define it. I don't define it as having much to do with virtuosity. If we did that, then certainly it would be some person we've never heard of in a basement somewhere.

When you put everything into one bucket, though, it's him.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
19375 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:43 am to
Technically within the Beatles universe, George Martin was the least replaceable.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95464 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 11:26 am to
quote:

When you put everything into one bucket, though, it's him.


Better than Gilmour?

quote:

Depends on how you define it.


I suppose so.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39715 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:


Better than Gilmour?
I'm the wrong person to ask if we're rating Pink Floyd, but sure.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram