- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
musicians who never reached their potential
Posted on 3/18/14 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 3/18/14 at 6:09 pm
i don't mean someone who died tragically at a young age....i'm talking about someone who lived a full life, but for whatever reason(s), was never able to recapture whatever spark he (or she) had out of the gate. sales/commercial success is irrelevant here....just list (or talk about) someone who once had "it", and now....doesn't.
my easy pick would be syd barrett. having spent the majority of his life in seclusion, i can't help but wonder if things turned out differently, what kind of music he would've created in his later years. he had a few decent solo albums post-floyd, but by many accounts, alot of outside help was needed in order to patch them together & make something coherent out of 'em. but even those albums were years before he disappeared altogether...
another pick (and i'll probably get laughed at for even suggesting it) is tom scholz. love or hate boston, the first two albums were ahead of the curve from a sonic standpoint, and there was no reason to think scholz didn't have more in the hopper. instead, "boston" released only four more studio albums in the next 35 years, and each one was progressively (and exponentially) worse than the last. and sonically, each album has regressed alot as well, the newest album having a programmed drum sound an 8-year could do a better job with on a casio keyboard. love him or hate him, scholz did have an ear once upon a time...WTF happened?
fire away....
my easy pick would be syd barrett. having spent the majority of his life in seclusion, i can't help but wonder if things turned out differently, what kind of music he would've created in his later years. he had a few decent solo albums post-floyd, but by many accounts, alot of outside help was needed in order to patch them together & make something coherent out of 'em. but even those albums were years before he disappeared altogether...
another pick (and i'll probably get laughed at for even suggesting it) is tom scholz. love or hate boston, the first two albums were ahead of the curve from a sonic standpoint, and there was no reason to think scholz didn't have more in the hopper. instead, "boston" released only four more studio albums in the next 35 years, and each one was progressively (and exponentially) worse than the last. and sonically, each album has regressed alot as well, the newest album having a programmed drum sound an 8-year could do a better job with on a casio keyboard. love him or hate him, scholz did have an ear once upon a time...WTF happened?
fire away....
This post was edited on 3/18/14 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 3/18/14 at 7:02 pm to vandelay industries
Syd Barrett gets my vote as well. Pink Floyd would have been so much different because David Gilmour would have likely never joined the band.
Syd's limited work is excellent....but we lost decades of music thanks to his acid addition
Syd's limited work is excellent....but we lost decades of music thanks to his acid addition
Posted on 3/18/14 at 7:21 pm to vandelay industries
Would say Ryan Adams but he hasn't lived a full life
Posted on 3/18/14 at 7:25 pm to deathvalleyfreak43
I read this thread and immediately thought Badfinger for whatever reason. They had a lot of support from Apple and the Beatles but couldn't quite get there save a few hits.
Posted on 3/18/14 at 7:45 pm to deathvalleyfreak43
quote:
Would say Ryan Adams but he hasn't lived a full life
go ahead and say it. maybe "a full life" was too strong a way to put it....how about "has had the opportunity to have a large & strong body of work", but maybe his (or her) creativity hit the wall early on, he just lost focus & stopped making music altogether, or any number of reasons....
Posted on 3/18/14 at 8:11 pm to Larry
quote:
I read this thread and immediately thought Badfinger for whatever reason. They had a lot of support from Apple and the Beatles but couldn't quite get there save a few hits.
man, what a tragic history for that band...but some would argue that lack of success notwithstanding, they still were solid from a creative standpoint (well, as long as their core lineup was still active, anyway). a stranger than fiction story, though...
Posted on 3/18/14 at 9:02 pm to vandelay industries
I agree with Syd Barrett as well. His solo career had promise but he couldn't handle the pressure.
Posted on 3/18/14 at 9:06 pm to vandelay industries
If only Bob Stinson stayed alive..... Bowie would have got around to working with him. Who knows?
This post was edited on 3/18/14 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 3/18/14 at 9:06 pm to RoyalBaby
Ace Frehley (I think he got lazy and doped up)
Tom Scholz is a very good answer
Tom Scholz is a very good answer
Posted on 3/18/14 at 9:24 pm to Chitter Chatter
quote:
Ace Frehley (I think he got lazy and doped up)
true...he still has a chance to right that wrong, though. 'anomaly', for all its highs & lows, is certainly more adventurous than anything he did before (not that he's done much, considering it was almost 20 years between albums, lol), and maybe the next album will follow suit...
Posted on 3/18/14 at 9:24 pm to vandelay industries
quote:
Badfinger
It seems like they got caught up in between the British Invasion and the Woodstock Era. A lot of good bands in that time frame probably got lost and forgotten.
Posted on 3/18/14 at 9:27 pm to OldTigahFot
quote:I never knew until the other day, that the Beatles signed them to Apple Records.
It seems like they got caught up in between the British Invasion and the Woodstock Era. A lot of good bands in that time frame probably got lost and forgotten.
Posted on 3/18/14 at 9:47 pm to Dandy Lion
The Beatles they broke up 2 early b4 their prime
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:45 am to vandelay industries
Definitely Eddie Wilson.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:50 am to vandelay industries
Sorry, re-read. Picked a dead guy.
I'll still say Buckley, out of respect. But if bands count maybe King's X. They influenced a ton of bigtime groups but never got that big themselves. Jellyfish too.
I'll still say Buckley, out of respect. But if bands count maybe King's X. They influenced a ton of bigtime groups but never got that big themselves. Jellyfish too.
This post was edited on 3/19/14 at 1:02 am
Posted on 3/19/14 at 8:55 am to Backinthe615
Jackson C. Frank. He put out maybe two records in his lifetime, but at least one of his songs, "Blues Run the Game", has been covered by just about every acoustic guitarist you've ever heard of. Done in at a fairly early age by mental illness, died virtually penniless and homeless in the late 1990's at the age of 56 I believe.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News