- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Drum Talk: Rack Systems
Posted on 5/18/12 at 9:53 am
Posted on 5/18/12 at 9:53 am
So I've been doing a little research and I think I'm about to make the rack transition. With the space I'm in and the size of my kit, I need to save some room. Plus its a pain in the arse to try and wiggle in stands and not damage pieces.
Any of my fellow skin smackers have a rack? I'm looking at Gibraltar right now. I'm thinking curved front, right side full extension and a left side wing. My only concern is that wing though. Will it hold a snare, 8" tom, 20" crash and 18" crash? Will the weight be too much?
Any of my fellow skin smackers have a rack? I'm looking at Gibraltar right now. I'm thinking curved front, right side full extension and a left side wing. My only concern is that wing though. Will it hold a snare, 8" tom, 20" crash and 18" crash? Will the weight be too much?
Posted on 5/18/12 at 11:08 am to Srbtiger06
If you're using the rack on a kit that you don't gig with or otherwise move- or if you have a fat roadie who sets it up and tears it down after each gig- and if your cymbals are at a level higher than the top of your head when you play, you may enjoy a rack. I used a Gibralter rack several years ago, which I bought for the same reasons you list (saving space), and I was disappointed to find that the footprint of my kit with the rack was almost identical to the footprint of the kit without the rack.
I also began to hate the rack after gigging with it for a few months, for several reasons: (1) I play my cymbals low. Very low, as in below eye-level when I'm sitting behind the kit. The Gibralter rack's tube-stands were too tall and prevented me from adjusting my cymbals to a height that I was comfortable with; (2) The set-up/tear-down time was the same as when using separate stands; and (3) it noticeably increased the overall weight of my hardware case while simultaneously being a pain-in-the-arse to pack.
When my patience with the rack finally ran out and I switched back to individual stands, it was like a breath of fresh air; so much simpler setting up, tearing down, and adjusting everything.
I also began to hate the rack after gigging with it for a few months, for several reasons: (1) I play my cymbals low. Very low, as in below eye-level when I'm sitting behind the kit. The Gibralter rack's tube-stands were too tall and prevented me from adjusting my cymbals to a height that I was comfortable with; (2) The set-up/tear-down time was the same as when using separate stands; and (3) it noticeably increased the overall weight of my hardware case while simultaneously being a pain-in-the-arse to pack.
When my patience with the rack finally ran out and I switched back to individual stands, it was like a breath of fresh air; so much simpler setting up, tearing down, and adjusting everything.
Posted on 5/18/12 at 2:28 pm to Srbtiger06
I had an Icon rack with my old Pearl set. After trying it, I'm not a rack fan. Being pretty picky about my set up, as most drummers are, I found the rack to be pretty limiting as far as configuration was concerned. That said, the Icon is a good sturdy system for someone who needs a rack.
Posted on 5/18/12 at 7:10 pm to notslim99
I'm probably going to get one. Found a good deal on Craigslist. $100 for the setup I want with a couple clamps. Worth a shot.
Popular
Back to top

2






