Started By
Message

re: Audiophile/Vinyl Thread - Post Pics, Advice, Questions, Setups, etc.

Posted on 3/21/16 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/21/16 at 7:10 pm to
Looks like an old Shure....can you get a clearer pic of the cartridge itself? The big black thing in the first pic is just the headshell--the small screw on top holds the cartridge in via a little flat metal plate on the underside of the headshell. I believe the cartridge screws from bottom up into to the metal plate, and the metal plate is held in by the silver screw that is in the center of the headshell.


No matter what, I am going to strongly recommend you get a new cartridge. That one is really old and is probably not going to sound that good.

The cantilever, which is the long "needle"protrusion from the front of the cartridge has the diamond stylus attached at one end and is mounted into the "motor" or cartridge body on the other. Where it meets the cartridge body, there are tiny elastic bushings that act as shock absorberers while the needle dances through the grooves. This fluidity that the suspension provides is what keeps your records from getting damaged.

After many years, they get dry rot--just like if a classic car sat up on jacks for 20 years and you took it out for a drive without doing a thing. The suspension will squeak and probably not be very responsive. Change the shocks and struts and grease the springs and you are way better off...same with an old cartridge, except you can't grease it--just gotta get a new one.



You can get a decent new cart for $100 or a really decent one for around $400.

But hey--the table, which is a killer, cost you zero!!

Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/21/16 at 7:12 pm to
Spinning some 5 1/4" discs...



Blind Melon...1992
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 3/21/16 at 7:19 pm to
Thank you, sir
Posted by auzach91
Marietta, GA
Member since Jan 2009
41348 posts
Posted on 3/23/16 at 12:21 am to
Found dark side of the moon today for 10$ in great condition and just put it on for the first time after sparking a bowl. Life is grand right now. Feels like a just look a delorean to 1973
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
25459 posts
Posted on 3/23/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Found dark side of the moon today for 10$ in great condition


IIRC, Pink Floyd re-issued most of their catalog in vinyl a couple of years ago. You can get it new pretty easily. $27 on Amazon

$10 is a good buy though if it is in good condition, but I always prefer buying new vinyl.
Posted by auzach91
Marietta, GA
Member since Jan 2009
41348 posts
Posted on 3/23/16 at 12:46 pm to
Yeah I had been thinking about getting from Amazon but went to the local shop and it was tucked away without a scratch on it. Looks brand new.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 3/23/16 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

I believe the cartridge screws from bottom up into to the metal plate



Here is the underside. Does this help?

Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/23/16 at 8:53 pm to
Watching the "IT" festival DVD...



Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6532 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 11:00 am to
Alright Marco.... been doing some research on the speakers you recommended. Since there seems to be no way for me to listen to either speaker i'm going on a rec and spec sheets. The biggest glaring thing b/w the 2 is that the 1Ci is a 2-way and the F6 is a 3 way. 1Ci with a 1' tweeter and 8" woofer in a cabinet basically the same size as the F6. F6 has a 1" tweeter, 6.5' mid and 2 6.5" woofers. By looks alone you would assume (someone not knowing better "me") that the F6 automatically sounds better. By size of the woofer and cabinet space of the 1Ci you'd assume you would possibly reach a lower bass level, but also still hit the tighter bass notes?
the 1Ci has a higher sensitivity rating @ 90db and the F6 @ 87db. I think i'm correct, but doesn't that mean the 1Ci should be more efficient at lower volumes?
I see (with the demo model) that i could either spend $759 or $999 and i'd assume get what should be the better speaker for $240 more although it technically has less speakers in the cabinet?

The thing that kind of concerns me (i prolly can't tell the difference) is that in some Q & As done on Vandersteen's site by the man himself he says the 1Ci sounds brighter due to it being an entry level speaker. Again, not sure if this matters to my virgin ears. not sure if i should be concerned or not with that statement. Also, says its like that so it performs well on demos?

I'm good with the recs on the amps and have read great things on both of them. Although, i think i may stay with getting the Debut Carbon though. Most forums say the tonearm alone is worth spending the money not counting the better cartridge.

let me know what you think.... and again thanks for your help!

edit... just realized that the 1Ci technically has no cabinet.
This post was edited on 3/24/16 at 3:16 pm
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:41 pm to
The Vandersteen is a better speaker--it is the little brother in a family of speakers going up to $60k. Richard Vandersteen has been producing loudspeakers for 30+ years and knows how to design a musical speaker.

Your concern with their saying the speaker sounds brighter...brighter compared to their upper models, which are in the thousands of dollars, shouldn't be an issue. The upper models should be a little more tame in the highs--they cost a lot more--those small subtleties are what you pay for when you move up the line.


Also, MusicDirect has the VPI Traveller turntable on sale. It is normally $1000, but is now $699. It has a built in phono pre amp and comes with an Ortofon 2M Red cart. The project is $400 and you will need a phono stage--roughly $250, so $650 total...you may want to consider the VPI table that is on sale, as it is only $50 more than the ProJect with a Bellari phono pre amp combo.

...and the VPI has a tonearm that is a big jump up from the ProJect, as well as having a better bearing and plinth.

Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6532 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:55 pm to
okay.... thats what i figured with the vandersteens....

and shite.... just when i thought i had the TT figured out....

oh and what about connectors (brand recs)? i see the vandersteens need spades.
This post was edited on 3/24/16 at 6:57 pm
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:19 pm to
For now, just get the entry level Audioquest interconnects from Music Direct...the Forest line, I believe. They are usually like 40-50% off from MD. I bought a few pair to have around for when I swap gear around, but I got them at BestBuy--they will price match MusicDirect.

Most cables in the $50-$250/pair range will reveal similar results (IMO). When you start to move into higher grades of audio gear, say $8000+ power amps/$8000 pre amps and such, you would probably want to up the cable budget to the $800/pair per piece of gear range.

An audiophile rule of thumb is "spend 10-15% of the cost of the gear on interconnects/cables/power cords"--again, just a rule of thumb to go by for a beginner.

One thing to note, and it may not be an issue for you, is the AudioQuest entry RCA interconnects are a single cord that splits into a "Y" at each end. If the amps left & right RCA jacks aren't close together, you may not be able to spread them far enough apart. This is common on higher end gear, or mono amps, where one cord goes to one amp and one goes to the other.

Look at the pic below to see what I am speaking of. The red cable is an inexpensive AudioQuest RCA interconnect ($60). It is a single cord that splits at the ends.

The purple/green/white cables are reference class XLO Electric (not $60) interconnects. They are two seperate cables--one for left, and one for right.





The issue only arises when you have left/right inputs that are on opposite ends of the gear.

Below is a pic of the back of my McIntosh c500t pre amp. All the inputs for the left channel are on the left side and all the inputs for the right are on the right side--thus the cheaper AudioQuest cables pictured above would not work as they can not spread apart enough...




Also, the green/white/purple cables in the first pic are terminated with XLR connectors--also known as Balanced connection. It is the same as a Neutrik connector commonly seen on Pro audio/microphones/guitar amps, etc.

XLR, or Balanced connections, are usually offered on higher end pieces of gear, but not always--as it depends on the design of the amp.

If your new gear has the option of using Balanced connections, then do it. It usually has a much lower noise floor resulting in a larger Signal to Noise Ratio. Terminating the cable with Balanced connectors vs. RCA (also called "single-ended" in audiophile speak), will cost about 20% or so more.

Hope I didn't throw too much at you


Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6532 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:41 pm to
nah man.... shite, i'm getting more info from you in your post than i could find in weeks of scouring through the crap on the net. I understand the concepts, but the amount of gear is incredible. No way i could make a decision on my own... it would take me months


Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/25/16 at 12:09 am to
quote:

the 1Ci has a higher sensitivity rating of 90db and the F6 @ 87db. I think i'm correct, but doesn't that mean the 1Ci should be more efficient at lower volumes?



No...it means that the 90dB speaker will play 3dB louder than the 87dB speaker given the same amount of power....

...or inversely, the 90dB speaker will require 1/2 the power to play at the same volume level as the 87dB speaker, or the 87dB speaker will need twice the power to play at the same volume as the 90dB speaker-- (every +/-3dB requires the amp to double/halve its output power).

This post was edited on 3/25/16 at 12:12 am
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/26/16 at 5:51 pm to
Gone Phishin' this afternoon!

Watching the complete MAGNABALL show (8/21/15) from the Mac Mini HDD captured in Hi-Def/Hi-Rez...

...and what a friggin' KILLER Bathtub Gin!





Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6532 posts
Posted on 3/26/16 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

No...it means that the 90dB speaker will play 3dB louder than the 87dB speaker given the same amount of power....


thats what i get for thinking i was getting somewhere with this!


I was looking into the inputs for the amp and the speakers. looks like the connectors for the vandersteens are spades, but the quad says analog (possibly bananas?) trying to find cables that'll fit both without having to spend $200 on those to. looks like audioadvisor will build audio quest type 4 wires with the type of connectors one needs.


would bananas be whats needed for this quad vena?
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/26/16 at 7:16 pm to
Those are spade on the back of the amp. The red and black round connectors screw open and close. Slide the spade in and tighten.
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/26/16 at 7:17 pm to
...and analog refers to the RCA inputs, not the speaker output taps.

All you need is a regular pair of speaker cables with spades on both ends (no bi-wire).
This post was edited on 3/26/16 at 7:19 pm
Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6532 posts
Posted on 3/26/16 at 8:35 pm to
sweet thanks! so, those audio quest type 4s would be good with audio advisor putting the spades on them good enough?
This post was edited on 3/26/16 at 8:47 pm
Posted by Marco Esquandolas
Member since Jul 2013
11809 posts
Posted on 3/26/16 at 8:51 pm to
Get THESE KIMBER KABLE with spades and go for 8 feet minimum, 10 feet if you can swing the little extra $$.
Jump to page
Page First 73 74 75 76 77 ... 337
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 75 of 337Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram