- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sinners is on max
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:04 am to Madking
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:04 am to Madking
quote:
Yea, watching gangsters crip walk to demonic music designed to destroy them is such an important extension of cultural roots.
Your lack of media literacy is astounding. First off, it was preacherboy’s song. It wasn’t designed to destroy anything. There’s a quote at the start of the film, and repeated at the end of that scene, that may help clear this up for you.
Second, it is a collage of dance. There’s also a fricking ballerina & a bootsie Collins lookalike in the scene lmao.
You’re obviously too thick to understand anything not spelled out in dialogue or text.
Reducing that scene to “gangsters cripwalking to demonic music designed to destroy them” has got to be trolling, hopefully.
You know, same things said about hip hop were said about blues, rock & roll, punk, metal, Elvis, Led Zeppelin, etc. And you just made it clear your only issue with the scene was the inclusion of hip hop elements.
It’s really not even rational to get that triggered by a musical scene
. This was fun.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 12:19 am
1
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:11 am to DeathByTossDive225
-“Media literacy”
- “It’s really not even rational to get that triggered by a musical scene”
Thanks for exposing yourself, agent Smith.
Then you proceed to misrepresent my post which is typical of your kind.
- “It’s really not even rational to get that triggered by a musical scene”
Thanks for exposing yourself, agent Smith.
Then you proceed to misrepresent my post which is typical of your kind.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 12:12 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:21 am to Madking
I think it’s pretty funny that you ignored the entire post and got re-triggered by a turn of phrase & being called out over being triggered.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:30 am to DeathByTossDive225
Not triggered but it’s pretty contradictory for you to first act as if I responded to everything in your post then immediately after say I ignored most of your post. You’re glitching agent Smith.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:32 am to Madking
quote:
pretty contradictory for you to first act as if I responded to everything in your post then immediately after say I ignored most of your post
It seems you are now struggling with just literacy literacy.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:34 am to DeathByTossDive225
You can say that but it makes no sense and is more applicable to your posts. Deflecting via insult is a weak and pathetic tactic.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 12:36 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:41 am to Madking
Here’s the post, minus the parts you acknowledged:
quote:
First off, it was preacherboy’s song. It wasn’t designed to destroy anything. There’s a quote at the start of the film, and repeated at the end of that scene, that may help clear this up for you.
Second, it is a collage of dance. There’s also a fricking ballerina & a bootsie Collins lookalike in the scene. You’re obviously too thick to understand anything not spelled out in dialogue or text.
Reducing that scene to “gangsters cripwalking to demonic music designed to destroy them” has got to be trolling, hopefully. You know, same things said about hip hop were said about blues, rock & roll, punk, metal, Elvis, Led Zeppelin, etc. And you just made it clear your only issue with the scene was the inclusion of hip hop elements.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 12:43 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:44 am to DeathByTossDive225
Like I said you misrepresented my post so thanks for reiterating that for me.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:51 am to Madking
Here’s the post minus the 100% accurate interpretation of your opinion, and minus the parts you acknowledged:
And here’s the scene for people to make their own judgement
quote:
First off, it was preacherboy’s song. It wasn’t designed to destroy anything. There’s a quote at the start of the film, and repeated at the end of that scene, that may help clear this up for you.
Second, it is a collage of dance. There’s also a fricking ballerina & a bootsie Collins lookalike in the scene. You’re obviously too thick to understand anything not spelled out in dialogue or text.
Reducing that scene to “gangsters cripwalking to demonic music designed to destroy them” has got to be trolling, hopefully.
And here’s the scene for people to make their own judgement
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 12:52 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:54 am to DeathByTossDive225
And again I didn’t say anything about the song or much of the things in the scene which others were out of place as well. I talked about one thing specifically but you can’t argue against that so you continue to try and twist what I posted per your programming. So again you did misrepresent my post.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 12:55 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 12:56 am to Madking
Quoted you directly.
Backpedaling puss.
Backpedaling puss.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:05 am to DeathByTossDive225
Then quoted yourself proving the misrepresentation. Quoting me once then quoting yourself and making claims based on that while pretending they’re based on mine is about as dishonest as it gets but it isn’t surprising or clever. It’s just the same old from your kind.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 1:06 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:10 am to Madking
Your quote is sitting at the top of this page.
You’re persistent, but that doesn’t help your argument.
I love the contrast of the YouTube comments
You’re persistent, but that doesn’t help your argument.
I love the contrast of the YouTube comments
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 1:12 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:12 am to DeathByTossDive225
Then you accuse me of being triggered when your walls of txt and ridiculous attempts to twist what I say to silence me show that it’s you who’s triggered. I was merely pointing out something small but consistent throughout the movie which speaks to dallas’ point that it’s an ok horror flick that’s really overrated.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 1:15 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:13 am to DeathByTossDive225
I’m consistent because truth doesn’t change. Only your attempts at different twists and angles of attacks have.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:17 am to Madking
quote:
I’m consistent because truth doesn’t change. Only your attempts at different twists and angles of attacks have.
Not “consistent” — “persistent”.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:21 am to Madking
quote:
I was merely pointing out something small but consistent throughout the movie which speaks to dallas’ point
And what is that? Explain it to me.
Here’s an excerpt from a professional review, which is distilled perfectly in that specific scene:
quote:
Sinners suggests that music allows us to experience a form of "time travel," connecting with the past through the voices of ancestors, understanding the present through shared emotions, and glimpsing potential futures through the evolving sounds and styles it inspires.
Here’s your take on the same scene:
quote:
Yea, watching gangsters crip walk to demonic music designed to destroy them is such an important extension of cultural roots.
Hm… very interesting this was your takeaway.
Very interesting indeed.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 1:26 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:24 am to DeathByTossDive225
Distinction without a difference in this case
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:28 am to Madking
Distinction without a difference would imply the review’s takeaway is indiscernible from your own.
Thus leading me to believe you referenced a logical fallacy not knowing what it meant.
You care to answer the leading question in the previous reply?
Thus leading me to believe you referenced a logical fallacy not knowing what it meant.
You care to answer the leading question in the previous reply?
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 1:29 am
Posted on 7/14/25 at 1:28 am to DeathByTossDive225
Because I didn’t read that, I watched the movie. Sorry I’m not an agent like you. You’ve already been given what I meant. This is another common, prescribed tactic by your kind, always trying to reframe and relitigate things that have already been explained to you. It’s very strange and never works.
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News