re: Paradise Lost 3

The reason why I commented is because I watched all three pretty recently and there wasn't a second when any irrefutable evidence was put in front of a jury that a logical person looks at and thinks these kids were guilty.

I remember specifically when the slow kid says it happens at a certain period of the day (day or night) and the interrogator specifically rephrases the question to make him commit to the actual story.

Maybe it's me but I just never felt like they got a fair trial originally. They just kept bringing the concept of being a cult kid and liking heavy metal to the jury as proof of a triple murder. That type of speculative evidence shouldn't be justifiable.

I have followed this case for 15 years and did 3 research papers on it for high school or college. I have spoken to Jesse Miskelley myself since he was released. There are tons of facts not even shown in the movies. To say they are guilty at this point is ignorant and wrong. Nobody deserves what they got. While I don't think Damien is a great person and was probably on a bad path to begin with, he didn't deserve what he got. This case is far from over. They are currently in the process of proving innocence and prosecuting the actual killers.

So you watched all three documentaries, and your conclusion is they're still guilty? Geez. A skeptic, sir, you are not.