Started By
Message

re: Lawrence of Arabia

Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:53 am to
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49505 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:53 am to
The invasion of the port town was one of the best things ever put on film. I love when the camera pans from the desert to the city, showing all of the heavy artillery facing the gulf. Definitely one of my top 5 favorite films.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35471 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:33 am to
He had major problems just trying to shoot off the Jersey shore. Hollywood wanted Jaws in a tank on the lot...along with everyone else.

Imagine being in Jordan? With no water and no cell phones?

Back in the 60's.
This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 1:43 am
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51536 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Lawrence....Lawrence of Arabia, he was an English guy, he came to fight the Turkish!! Great theme song.


This comment stuck out like a turd in a punchbowl.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34465 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 9:51 am to
I agree with pretty much everything you said. I also watched it a few weeks ago for the first time. I can appreciate it for what it was, but Lawrence wasn’t that great of a character IMO.

I didn’t hate, didn’t love it.

I still get why it’s a great movie though.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89501 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 10:14 am to
quote:

I still get why it’s a great movie though.


If you hate O'Toole and the Lawrence character in the film (which I do not, but I get), it is still an acting clinic:

Quinn - one of his best performances
Sharif - his best performance
Guinness - his best performance (IMHO)

And let's talk about Jose Ferrer - if you want to learn how to be a badass in a film without saying much, you watch this performance and Jack Palance in Shane.

Claude Rains is always fantastic and is here as well.

Frankly, David Lean was born to direct this type of film and this was his masterpiece - every shot was spot on - the desert is the main character of the film, not Lawrence (who serves largely as a narrator except for brief periods of the film where is nominally the hero).

This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 10:15 am
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34465 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 10:33 am to
You’re right about the rest of the cast. They were all incredible to watch.
Posted by johnnydrama
Possibly Trashy
Member since Feb 2010
8710 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 10:40 am to
quote:

This comment stuck out like a turd in a punchbowl.

It did have a little wang in it.
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
7935 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 10:49 am to
quote:

I didn't not like it and I didn't love it either. But I am glad I've finally seen it all the way through.


Watch it again after some time and you will like it more... then watch it again after some time and you may come to love it.

Lawrence is one of those films that you miss the depth of it on the first watch.

quote:

Abu Tayi: What ails the Englishman?

Ali Sherif: That man he killed was the man he brought out of the Nefud.

Abu Tayi: Ahhh... it was written then!! Better to have left him


One of the great moments of the film before they take Akabar
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39730 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

This comment stuck out like a turd in a punchbowl.


Speaking of the punchbowl...

quote:

It does have a little wang to it. Good, though.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22743 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Watch it again after some time and you will like it more... then watch it again after some time and you may come to love it.

Lawrence is one of those films that you miss the depth of it on the first watch.


This is probably accurate. I loathed 2001 the first time I saw it... I thought it was Uber pretentious dogshit that made no sense. (granted I was a teenager when I saw it and didn't get it At all)

But I was still Intrigued by it. Then I read up a bit on it after watching it a second time then a third and fourth etc. And finally figured out what the film was trying to portray.

Now Lawrence of Arabia is obviously not as cryptic and out there as 2001, but I would imagine after a second watch, I would become more attaxhed to it...especially if I saw it on a big screen.

I think the biggest misconception I had going in was the portrayal of Lawrence. I thought it was going to be some 10 Commandments type "hero" epic where the main figure is clearly has one type of Character arc.

But Lawrence was not that at all. It's rare I guess that a film this big and grand had a protagonist who was so unlikeable at multiple times in the film.

And I do agree about the supporting cast, Guinness and Raines and Sharif and Quinn were all amazing. This had to be one of Raines final big parts I figure. I Mean the guy was fricking Prince John in 1938.



P.S. Now I'm on a Lean kick. I've seen Bridge on the River Kwai many times and some of his otherd, but just started Doctor Zhivago. Julie Christie in that movie may be the most beautiful creature ever put on film.
This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 1:45 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35471 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:10 pm to
quote:


But Lawrence was not that at all. It's rare I guess that a film this big and grand had a protagonist who was so unlikeable at multiple times in the film.


Yeah, he's a complicated character which is what makes it so interesting. The acting performance also leaves you wondering...where is Lawrence coming from? What is his actual aim?



Spoilers (I guess, it has been 40 years but whatever):












He kills a man as a death sentence and says he liked it...which is why he didn't want to go back to the desert...as if the desert and war was changing him.

He loses the aim of the revolt and becomes hell bent on revenge (for what reason?) but personal against the Turks - raped him (hinted at); he slaughters, says take no prisoners...becomes like a theif in the desert blowing up trains and then his followers/band of banditos get to pillage the trains and take spoils like a pirate.

He had no real Army (in the movie) and after his first objective Aqaba...his one real victory, everything after that is just maurading horde guerrilla warfare, rape and pillage and steal.

And the film doesn't shy away from the accusations that he was a self-promoter. As the intro at his funeral shows, the reporter covering him calls him the most shameless self-promoter since Barnum and Bailey.

IRL he was an enigma, a small sized man with grand ambitions, died early, wrote a book grandizing himself, sort of wanted to give Arabia back to the Arabs, had an influence in WWI but it was minor.

The film does a great job of you leaving the film wondering whether or not you like Lawrence or not.

After the reporter calls him a shameless promoter in the opening funeral scene, a mourner confronts him and says he takes exception to that remark, that Lawrence was a great, great man. And the reporter asks if he knew him and the man says no he never had the pleasure and the reporter walks away and mutters something like, well I knew him.



This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 2:11 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram