Started By
Message

re: Are older movies truly better?

Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:46 pm to
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8013 posts
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:46 pm to
More specifically, I have a hard time appreciating any war movie prior to Apocalypse Now. I find just about all of them, even Bridge on the River Kwai and some of the others in the pantheon, to be just kind of stiff and goofy.

I'd argue that war is such a visceral experience that getting an accurate physical portrayal of the experience, like in SPR or Band of Brothers or Pacific or on and on, is absolutely vital.

Now, some of the others (Citizen Kane, Godfathers, etc) are truly great and can be appreciated across the ages.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63596 posts
Posted on 1/3/15 at 6:10 pm to
While I think some recent movies have captured the visceral terror of war, there are older movies made their points and we're just as affecting. Paths of Glory, All Quiet on the Western Front, Battleground, Sands of Iwo Jima, etc. And Bridge on the River Kwai wasn't dependent on that kind of immediacy
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram