Started By
Message

re: After giving Promet[h]eus a shot on cable

Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:03 pm to
it is possble that prometheus 2 (hope they get a better title than that) clears this confusion up while being a fricking awesome movie making the original even better. Maybe they had all of this shite planned from the beginning


not holding my breath though
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52601 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:03 pm to
don't listen to Freaux. you leave that Howard The Duck poster up in your bedroom. he can't change you!
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

all of the people shitting on it will probably say that they like John carter, immediately invalidating their opinion on science fiction.



Really? I liked both movies.
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52601 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

prometheus 2 (hope they get a better title than that)
well let's hear some suggestions

Prometheus 2: The Secret of the Goo
Engineering 2063
Prometheus: Resurrection



then, of course, Promethreeus (Prome3us)
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:10 pm to
Prometheus discovered fire so who is the first guy to use it to burn down a school? That's your title.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:11 pm to
never seent it and I am grateful.
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52601 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Prometheus discovered fire so who is the first guy to use it to burn down a school? That's your title.
i was thinking more along the lines of this: The mightiest power is primarily led by DAVID (Eva Green), the vengeful commander of the XENOMORPH navy, who is second in command to the mortal-turned-god leader SPACE JOCKEY. She has the added incentive of seeking to settle a blood score against the HUMANs who killed her family when she was a child.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37223 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

i can almost hear you sucking the entertainment value out of this movie


Hey now, I admitted is a beautiful movie to watch. That was the entertainment.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37223 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

what? this isn't fricking star trek.


Maybe it should be.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37223 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

i like my boring science fiction as much as the next guy. seriously i do, but I'm still going to love blade runner, empire, aliens. They don't get into the science of ANYTHING. well except how the aliens reproduce.


It's not about "getting into the science," and showing formulas or scientific analysis. It's about being clear with what the rules are.

Science Fiction is particular in that it has to make OUR world seem familiar and new at the time by allowing for some specific element( or elements) to change it.

Blade Runner, boring or not (and I think it's brilliant), does exactly that.
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 3:20 pm
Posted by Backinthe615
Member since Nov 2011
6871 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Suggestions


Dunno about a whole movie, but a ringer pitch for Robot Chicken and obvious Simpsons nod would've been.

Technician: "Well, here's your problem, this robot's set on DICK"

nb4hewasjustloyalkillingthejoke
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:25 pm to
The biggest rule for me in science fiction is having it be relatable. Ill take this small moment in ESB as an ecxample. The falcon powers up, then immediately starts powering down, Han bangs the panel, boom problem fixed. Is it realistic? No. Is it relatable to people of this time and planet? Yes. That's why I harp on the costumes in sci fi movies. You got to keep it relatable and connected to us. I think Prometheus succeeds at this level and that is what I think you're talking about here

quote:

Science Fiction is particular in that it has to make OUR world seem familiar and new at the time by allowing for some specific element( or elements) to change it.


In the end I do agree that the ooz should've been explained. That was 98% of what I didn like about it. Vickers comprising 1.5% and nitpicks the rest
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:27 pm to
I definitely would not categorize blade runner as boring sci fi. I want to clarify. Star Trek is but I like that too

Blade runner is a detective thriller set in the future with noire flair
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 3:28 pm
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52601 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:28 pm to
i didn't like the rolling spacecraft either. superdumb
Posted by JS87
Member since Aug 2010
16631 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:29 pm to
quote:


i didn't like the rolling spacecraft either


...and how both girls insisted on running a straight line to escape it.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37223 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

The biggest rule for me in science fiction is having it be relatable. Ill take this small moment in ESB as an ecxample. The falcon powers up, then immediately starts powering down, Han bangs the panel, boom problem fixed. Is it realistic? No. Is it relatable to people of this time and planet? Yes. That's why I harp on the costumes in sci fi movies. You got to keep it relatable and connected to us. I think Prometheus succeeds at this level and that is what I think you're talking about here


This seems at the micro-level though. Why is Han banging his hand on the pamel relatable to the time and planet? Because it's dirty and broken too? That's just artistic consistency... micro-level.


Movies have to do it at a macro-level as well, Prometheus doesn't.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:31 pm to
The devil is in the details, they just skimped on them regarding the ooz and it keeps Prometheus from being great. Doesn't make it a piece of poo
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37223 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

The devil is in the details, they just skimped on them regarding the ooz and it keeps Prometheus from being great. Doesn't make it a piece of poo


Like I said before to each his own. For me, it undermines the entire intention of the genre itself to leave something so open and problematic. There's a difference between openness and a gaping plothole.

Therefore, poo.

Also, your comment was that someone who liked John Carter has an invalidated opinion about science fiction. Them's fightin' words.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Why is Han banging his hand on the pamel relatable to the time and planet?


Seriously? Everyone has done that at some point. It even worked on my Xbox 360 quite a few times.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Also, your comment was that someone who liked John Carter has an invalidated opinion about science fiction. Them's fightin' words.


I say that because I can't reconcile hating Prometheus and liking JC. I'm actually just shocked someone likes JC
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram