Started By
Message

re: why not let the PAC 10 Champion play the

Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:43 pm to
Posted by threeputt
God's Country
Member since Sep 2008
24806 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Records against pac 10 since 2002


If that is correct the SEC is 9-10 against the PAC 10 ...

Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27060 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:45 pm to
so ur saying that if florida had scheduled Washington State in 02-08 the SEC would be a lot better than the Pac-10? man we fricked up
Posted by threeputt
God's Country
Member since Sep 2008
24806 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:47 pm to
No I am just saying that the SEC does not have a winning record against the Pac 10 .. Nothing more ...
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27060 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

No I am just saying that the SEC does not have a winning record against the Pac 10


then you are lying


The SEC leads the Pac-10 62-40-5
Posted by threeputt
God's Country
Member since Sep 2008
24806 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:51 pm to
whatever .. I was just quoting the stat that you posted ..

I still think that the Pac 10 is better than the SEC this year
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27060 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:52 pm to
i dont understand why they cant at least have 1 bowl game every year with SEC vs Pac-10. seems insane and stupid
Posted by threeputt
God's Country
Member since Sep 2008
24806 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 12:53 pm to
agree
Posted by bags03
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since May 2004
3023 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

i dont understand why they cant at least have 1 bowl game every year with SEC vs Pac-10. seems insane and stupid


Pac 10 fan bases don't exactly travel well so you won't see any East Coast bowl alignments with us in it. We are starting up with the Alamo Bowl this year though so maybe the SEC can get involved in that one.

I will take LSU vs Oregon in Dallas for now though.
Posted by Feed Me Popeyes
Baltimore, MD
Member since Apr 2008
2104 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I'd rather WAC vs MWC for an auto birth



I'd never thought of this, but it has potential
Posted by T1
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2006
3060 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 1:25 pm to
It HAD potential. Now that the top of the WAC will be the top of the MWC there is some talk of a MWC - CUSA alliance for an AQ spot. That doesn't make much sense though because CUSA has never had a really good team.
Posted by Feed Me Popeyes
Baltimore, MD
Member since Apr 2008
2104 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 1:26 pm to
yeah, agreed. forgot about the impending realignment
Posted by threeputt
God's Country
Member since Sep 2008
24806 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 1:44 pm to
nm

This post was edited on 11/27/10 at 1:45 pm
Posted by bags03
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since May 2004
3023 posts
Posted on 11/27/10 at 2:05 pm to
If the season ended now (and obviously doesn't involve Utah and Colorado), we would be hosting Arizona (4-4 in conference) for the Pac 10 Championship. USC is also 4-4 and beat UofA but they are obviously ineligible for postseason games.

Conference Championship games aren't always a good thing.

Why the hell does South Carolina get a 2nd shot at Auburn who CLEARLY proved it is the best SEC team?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram