- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why is USC ranked above...
Posted on 12/8/08 at 11:53 am to Trojan Ace
Posted on 12/8/08 at 11:53 am to Trojan Ace
quote:
Is it me, or did Bama actually hire Washington State's head coach in this decade?
apparently, the strip clubs in pullman sucked ..
Posted on 12/8/08 at 11:57 am to dukke v
15 years ago .. great point ..
TRY 17!! Just sayin!!!!
Well if that is your criteria, I guess Bama's last MNC in '92 is irrelevant too.
TRY 17!! Just sayin!!!!
Well if that is your criteria, I guess Bama's last MNC in '92 is irrelevant too.
Posted on 12/8/08 at 11:58 am to BamaScoop
don't you know...USC will NEVER be ranked out of the top 10 & ALWAYS above a more deserving team, so says ESPN, the AP voters & assorted other jackass "experts". 

Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:00 pm to Trojan Ace
quote:
Well if that is your criteria, I guess Bama's last MNC in '92 is irrelevant too.
And this has to do with what???????????????????
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:00 pm to Trojan Ace
quote:
Well if that is your criteria, I guess Bama's last MNC in '92 is irrelevant too.
please name the NCs out of the pac 10 since 1991 ..
i'll help you -- washington -- 1991, USC -- 2003 USC -- 2004 .. the first two were split titles fwiw ..
SEC -- alabama - 1992, florida -- 1996, tennessee -- 1998, LSU -- 2003, florida -- 2006, LSU -- 2007 .. and possibly florida again ..
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:01 pm to TigahRag
Yes, that is Bama's criteria for hiring. Strip clubs. Glad Bama reviewed Pullman's nightlife scene before making Mike Price an offer.
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:01 pm to Trojan Ace
quote:
Yes, that is Bama's criteria for hiring. Strip clubs. Glad Bama reviewed Pullman's nightlife scene before making Mike Price an offer.
it's a fricking joke you stupid idiot ..
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:01 pm to Trojan Ace
quote:
Well if that is your criteria, I guess Bama's last MNC in '92 is irrelevant too.
it is....that was what, 5 coaches ago? Not a single player, recruit, or coach was a part of that team. Most of the players don't even remember it happening.
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:03 pm to TigahRag
utah should be ahead of usc but honestly who really gives a shite?
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:04 pm to TigahRag
I got it. Obviously you didn't.
Seems to be the nature of this thread since I threw out numbers and everyone else throws out excuses and opinions.
Why doesn't someone refute what I said in the first place?
Seems to be the nature of this thread since I threw out numbers and everyone else throws out excuses and opinions.
Why doesn't someone refute what I said in the first place?
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:05 pm to Trojan Ace
quote:
Your own post. Jeez.
If you are talking to me. Let it be known or STFU!!!
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:05 pm to Trojan Ace
trojan i saw your original post with all the numbers and my original thought was "yeah im not reading all that fricking shite that dork posted."
sorry bud.
sorry bud.
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:06 pm to bbap
True.
Seasons not even over yet.
Utah beat Bama and USC lose to PSU and Utah would move up in that scenario.
USC and Utah are not playing in the MNC or can't argue about a split MNC like Texas.
Does it really matter?
Seasons not even over yet.
Utah beat Bama and USC lose to PSU and Utah would move up in that scenario.
USC and Utah are not playing in the MNC or can't argue about a split MNC like Texas.
Does it really matter?
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:07 pm to bbap
quote:
utah should be ahead of usc but honestly who really gives a shite?
it has nothing to do with the price of coffee in china .. but USC doesn't belong in the BCSNCG this season all things considered either ..
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:08 pm to dukke v
Ok.
I'll start every post with "DEAR DUKKE V!!!!!!"
I'll start every post with "DEAR DUKKE V!!!!!!"
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:08 pm to Trojan Ace
quote:
Why doesn't someone refute what I said in the first place?
b/c your numbers are a weak attempt at deflecting the point of the initial post....which was about USC/Utah. You throw out numbers comparing USC and Bama. try again with USC and UTah and you might get more responses.
And I, and many other LSU fans, realized Bama had a weak schedule and that was a big reason they were undefeated, and would lose to UF fairly handily.
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:09 pm to Trojan Ace
quote:
Why doesn't someone refute what I said in the first place?
yeah .. i'll go after you refute mine:
quote:
please name the NCs out of the pac 10 since 1991 ..
i'll help you -- washington -- 1991, USC -- 2003 USC -- 2004 .. the first two were split titles fwiw ..
SEC -- alabama - 1992, florida -- 1996, tennessee -- 1998, LSU -- 2003, florida -- 2006, LSU -- 2007 .. and possibly florida again ..
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:10 pm to Trojan Ace
quote:
Ok.
I'll start every post with "DEAR DUKKE V!!!!!!"
I just want to know what post you were talking about!!!
Posted on 12/8/08 at 12:10 pm to dukke v
frick pj you make threads impossible to read. seriously.
Back to top
