Started By
Message

re: Why don't the Bengals cut ties with Shemir Stewart and just sign Hendrickson to a deal?

Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:25 pm to
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

You refuse to define stupid shite because you can’t “lol”

It doesn’t need to be defined lol

If you have to think twice about it, don’t do it. It’s THAT easy lol
Posted by jiffyjohnson
1226 miles from Death Valley
Member since Nov 2011
5740 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

You can’t be this dumb lol


oh it was dumb, but its not "sign this one of a kind" contract dumb
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71291 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

It doesn’t need to be defined

It does “lol”
quote:

If you have to think twice about it

You’re dumb “lol”
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37114 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

If you have to think twice about it, don’t do it. It’s THAT easy lol


I didn’t think twice about NOT getting the covid vaccine. That would have been a HUGE deal in 2020
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

oh it was dumb, but its not "sign this one of a kind" contract dumb

He doesn’t have to sign it. Nobody disputed that.

But just be honest about his and his camps reasoning. They aren’t confident in his ability to not do stupid shite.

I am in my ability so I’d have no problem signing it.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:28 pm to
I’m sorry that all of your examples that you thought would be big gotchas were dumb. I get it. This is hard for y’all.
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
17911 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:28 pm to
The first bengal, yes, but many other teams use the exact same language
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37114 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

But just be honest about his and his camps reasoning.


They are

quote:

I’d have no problem signing it.


Least shocking statement in this thread
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37114 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

many other teams use the exact same language


I have a hard time believing this
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71291 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

But just be honest about his and his camps reasoning.

There’s a bullshite ambiguous clause where it’s impossible to determine what would and would not constitute a breach of material terms. That’s his camp’s reasoning and they’re 100% correct
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71291 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

I am in my ability

Your comments in this thread show otherwise
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
17911 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

I have a hard time believing this


Probably because your life revolves around arguing on this message board.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71291 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

I’m sorry that all of your examples that you thought would be big gotchas were dumb

I’m sorry you’re not smart.
Posted by jiffyjohnson
1226 miles from Death Valley
Member since Nov 2011
5740 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

but many other teams use the exact same language


could you tell me a few cause i was under the impression no one in the league had encountered this before big dog
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37114 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Probably because your life revolves around arguing on this message board.


I’ve heard the talking point but I haven’t actually seen it verified anywhere. Can you provide something?
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

They are

No they’re not lol
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

There’s a bullshite ambiguous clause where it’s impossible to determine what would and would not constitute a breach of material terms. That’s his camp’s reasoning and they’re 100% correct

AKA we don’t have confidence that he won’t do stupid shite BUT we want the money anyway lol

If they were honestly worried about the ambiguity then they could hash out the details with the team. But they don’t want that. Why? (Hint hint. See above lol)
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37114 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

If they were honestly worried about the ambiguity then they could hash out the details with the team. But they don’t want that.


You don’t know that
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
17911 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:53 pm to
It’s what every connected guy with no skin in the game has stated. Maybe they’re all wrong. I doubt it though.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37114 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

It’s what every connected guy with no skin in the game has stated.


Link?
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram