- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why doesn’t every team use the non-exclusive franchise tag?
Posted on 3/7/23 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 3/7/23 at 5:05 pm
With the Lamar news, I’m very confused.
I read the non-exclusive is cheaper than the exclusive tag ($32M for non-exclusive versus $45M for exclusive in LJ situation).
You have the right to match any contract.
If you choose not to match, you get 2 first round picks.
A lot of the time, the franchise tagged player is gone after the next year it seems like. So it isn’t like the team plans on signing them to a long term deal and doesn’t want to lose them. And it’s cheaper. If you lose them, you get more than adequate compensation. Most teams would take 2 first round picks over retaining any player they tagged.
So what don’t I understand?
I read the non-exclusive is cheaper than the exclusive tag ($32M for non-exclusive versus $45M for exclusive in LJ situation).
You have the right to match any contract.
If you choose not to match, you get 2 first round picks.
A lot of the time, the franchise tagged player is gone after the next year it seems like. So it isn’t like the team plans on signing them to a long term deal and doesn’t want to lose them. And it’s cheaper. If you lose them, you get more than adequate compensation. Most teams would take 2 first round picks over retaining any player they tagged.
So what don’t I understand?
Posted on 3/7/23 at 6:09 pm to Tigerfan56
It’s used fairly often but it’s a lot of money to gamble with. Only a few are worth it.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 6:40 pm to Tigerfan56
Yea I’ve never heard about it really before today
Posted on 3/7/23 at 8:43 pm to Tigerfan56
quote:
Why doesn’t every team use the non-exclusive franchise tag?
they do, but its for when all else fails kinda thing.
the star players are the only ones they use it on
i think it was cousins with redskins at the time that got franchise tagged 3 years in a row. each time it goes higher by 50% or something like that to make it cost a lot more
This post was edited on 3/7/23 at 8:45 pm
Popular
Back to top
4






