Started By
Message

re: Why do tennis players get old faster than any other sport

Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:24 am to
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
11496 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:24 am to
The hard courts are very tough on the knees and ankles. They lose their speed quickly after about age 26. There are some exceptions. Agasi and Conners played well into their 30's and remained competitive, but it is hard to remain at that level. It takes massive conditioning.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:26 am to
quote:

And those guys were the outliers. The overwhelming majority of basketball players, just like tennis players, peak in their 20s.



Jordan. Dirk Nowitzki. Kobe Bryant. Jason Kidd. Kevin Garnett. Paul Pierce. Steve Nash.

You can call these guys outliers, but if I list about four or five more the word "outlier" is no longer going to apply.

In tennis, you have Andre Agassi. He won a major at 33. That's it. He is THE outlier. You will never ever ever see a guy win a major in tennis at the age of 35. But you will see basketball players excelling at age 35. Not peaking, but not far from their peak.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51275 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:28 am to
The difference is you aren't very relevant in Tennis if you are outside of the top 10.

You can be very relevant in other sports outside of the top 10.
This post was edited on 7/19/12 at 11:40 am
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:32 am to
quote:

The hard courts are very tough on the knees and ankles. They lose their speed quickly after about age 26. There are some exceptions. Agasi and Conners played well into their 30's and remained competitive, but it is hard to remain at that level. It takes massive conditioning.


Exactly. Here is an illustrative 30 second clip of Nadal: Nadal sliding on a hard court

You can only slide around on a hard court for so many years until bone starts coming up on bone. And I was super lazy in pulling up that clip. Djokovic slides WAY more on a hard court than Nadal.

Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:33 am to
quote:

The difference is you aren't very relative in Tennis if you are outside of the top 10.

You can be very relative in other sports outside of the top 10.


You don't know what the word relative means.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:38 am to
Most of these players youre mentioning have all lost a step or two as they have gotten older. A player like Ray Lewis/Jon Vilma can make up that lost step because they are students of the game and know the tendancies of the offense. Their football iqs are high. Same goes with basketball players.

You cant make up a lost step or two in tennis like that. Once its lost, youre done
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51275 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:40 am to
quote:

You don't know what the word relative means.


Thats supposed to be relevent
Posted by ottothewise
Member since Sep 2008
32094 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:40 am to
quote:

I know speed and quickness play a big part in tennis, but so do they in football, basketball, etc.



there are no "role players" in singles tennis.



Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 11:45 am to


Professional Tennis Players also start their serious competitive career at a much younger age than most athletes.

If you aren't at least the best (#1 ranked single player) in your state by the time you turn 17, chances are you are not going to make it as a professional tennis player.

My point is the wear and tear on the body is more intense at an earlier age than say football, baseball, soccer, and golf.
Posted by GonePecan
Southeast of disorder
Member since Feb 2011
6086 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 12:04 pm to
Damn, my knees and ankles hurt after watching that clip. Found this one after looking at that one. Look where Nadal comes from to make this shot. LINK
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Damn, my knees and ankles hurt after watching that clip. Found this one after looking at that one. Look where Nadal comes from to make this shot. LINK


But that's on clay. That doesn't put nearly as much pressure on the joints. If tennis were played exclusively on clay, methinks more guys could play into their 30s.

Here is some vintage Djokovic hard-court sliding for ya: Djokovic vs. Murray Aussie Open Semifinal -- 39 shot rally
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

You cant make up a lost step or two in tennis like that. Once its lost, youre done


Agreed. Same thing for running backs. Ain't no such thing as a high IQ running back. You can't fake the funk. You lose a step, you're done.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

But that's on clay. That doesn't put nearly as much pressure on the joints. If tennis were played exclusively on clay, methinks more guys could play into their 30s.


i grew up playing on clay and its not much different than the hard courts. yea you slide around and all on clay but that slide still has to come to a stop
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Top notch analysis.


Says the guy who picks a smorgasbord of outliers.

And my NFL four year average was THE ENTIRE LEAGUE, not just running backs.

Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

You can call these guys outliers, but if I list about four or five more the word "outlier" is no longer going to apply.


Those guys you named either are or are fringe HALL OF FAMERS.

By definition, they're outliers.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

But that's on clay. That doesn't put nearly as much pressure on the joints. If tennis were played exclusively on clay, methinks more guys could play into their 30s.


On this, we agree.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

i grew up playing on clay and its not much different than the hard courts. yea you slide around and all on clay but that slide still has to come to a stop



I also grew up playing on clay.

It's a softer impact than hard courts when you're moving around.
Posted by FourThinInches
Member since Apr 2012
1351 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Most of these players youre mentioning have all lost a step or two as they have gotten older. A player like Ray Lewis/Jon Vilma can make up that lost step because they are students of the game and know the tendancies of the offense. Their football iqs are high. Same goes with basketball players.

You cant make up a lost step or two in tennis like that. Once its lost, youre done


I dunno Fed just won a Slam. Aggasi and Sampras both won Slams when they were over 30.

I think the problem is the 5 sets. I think the older vets can hang in the best of 3 set tournaments. I can't even imagine playing 5 sets...
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Says the guy who picks a smorgasbord of outliers.


No one has EVER won a slam past 33. There is no outlier.

How many people have dominated football or basketball past 33?
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I think the problem is the 5 sets. I think the older vets can hang in the best of 3 set tournaments. I can't even imagine playing 5 sets...


The women play best of three and they fizzle out at or around thirty.

The issue, though, is that most of them have been playing professional tennis for 10-15 years by then. That's the wear and tear on your body, the travel (which wears on you more than you might think), and just the general burnout that you get from doing the same job over and over again for over a decade.

And, as someone else mentioned, the length of the season needs to be addressed again.

But again, for every sport, athletes peak in their mid-20s and then start going downhill.

It's not that tennis players get old faster than anyone else--heck, by the time they're in their mid twenties they've been pro for a decade--rather, it's the PERCEPTION because the top players in tennis tend to hang it up at the "young" age of 30 or so, whereas the top players in other sports hang around in the pros for a bit longer for a large number of reasons. In some sports, your role diminishes. No problem. Your coach can scheme around you, etc. Not so in tennis.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram