Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

What was UCLA, along with all but USC and Oregon, thinking?

Posted on 9/14/25 at 6:53 am
Posted by Cell of Awareness
Member since Jan 2024
1229 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 6:53 am
Lose 35-10 to New Mexico in front of a Friday night crowd announced at 35.000 but looked like far less.

Also, Nico needs to give his dad a hug for talking him into ruining his career.

This post was edited on 9/14/25 at 6:54 am
Posted by cardswinagain
Member since Jun 2013
13229 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 6:56 am to
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted by Cell of Awareness
Member since Jan 2024
1229 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 6:59 am to
quote:

$$$$$$$$$$$$$


With donor base and local sponsor potential as big as theirs, is it worth that much to be the new Northwestern of a campus while putting all your athletes on four hour flights for conference events?

They could have been a leader in a rebuilt Pac12 or joined the Big 12 and been significant.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
38394 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 7:42 am to
quote:

joined the Big 12 and been significant
they just lost to New Mexico. They weren’t going to be significant anywhere
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12226 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 7:50 am to
You're looking at it too short-term.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13377 posts
Posted on 9/14/25 at 7:59 am to
Public university using one of its most valuable resources to make money. It's not as if they can ask the state for money. CA doesnt have any and what it does spend is on liberal causes to help strengthen Newsomes run for President. UCLA is paying for the sins of its state. They get their conference share win or lose.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram