Started By
Message

re: What team underachieved the most in what would have been "dynastic" years?

Posted on 6/27/25 at 8:25 pm to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60644 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Late 70s Houston Oilers. If not for the Steelers, they'd be 2 time champs,


losing to a better team is not underachieving
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8104 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

losing to a better team is not underachieving


Yep. Just unfortunate.

They were the 49ers/Cowboys of that era. Even worse being in the same division.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60644 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 8:44 pm to
I mean they pretty much achieved what they should have
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8104 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

I mean they pretty much achieved what they should have


They did. Would have been interesting, especially that shitty weather game in Earl’s first year, to see if things had been different if they’d played in the Dome. Probably not, but also not 34 -5.
Posted by icecreamsnowball
Member since Mar 2025
893 posts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

THE JUDGE era Yankees had two chips stolen

TWENTY-SIX CURVEBALLS IN A ROW, BITCH
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram