- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Unofficial 2017 Wimbledon Thread
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:11 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:11 pm to Bunk Moreland
If the match doesn't finish, the sport books would count that as a NO play and just refund your money.
Some books vary though.
Some books vary though.
This post was edited on 7/12/17 at 12:14 pm
1
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:12 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Would you get the win for that withdrawal?
At most books, yes. 1 completed set is usually the requirement for the match to have action.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:12 pm to imAMAZING
Novak's match against Mannarino was definitely a lower level of tennis than the other R16 matches.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:14 pm to little billy
And now I see he retired against Berdych. What happened?
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:17 pm to little billy
Federer move to skip clay season in order to fully recover from his injuries is paying huge dividends now.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:18 pm to imAMAZING
Raonic showing signs of life. This ain't over yet.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:20 pm to imAMAZING
quote:
Federer
Is by far the best player in the world right now and has been all year.
Eta except for clay lol. My point though is if weren't a point based ranking system Fed would be #1 right now.
This post was edited on 7/12/17 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:22 pm to RedHawk
quote:
Raonic showing signs of life. This ain't over yet.
Fed just felt like toying with him.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:22 pm to bayoucracka
Federer/Cilic will be an epic Final
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:23 pm to little billy
I wouldn't say by far.
Nadal would have beaten him in like every clay court tournament if he had played and made it far enough. Besides whatever one it was that Nadal lost early
Nadal would have beaten him in like every clay court tournament if he had played and made it far enough. Besides whatever one it was that Nadal lost early
This post was edited on 7/12/17 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:24 pm to BayouBengals03
I agree. I amended my post.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:25 pm to BayouBengals03
Federer is just a cyborg. We are all witnesses.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:29 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
I wouldn't say by far.
Me either. He is playing the best this year, but he had several five setters in Australia, and then saved a few match points in the 1000 level tournaments before the clay season.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:30 pm to little billy
Cilic does have the best shot out of the remaining players to beat Federer. He was up 2 sets last year and probably should won, but didn't have the mental fortitude to do so. I know comparing last year to this year Federer is completely different, but Clicic is also playing the best tennis of his career.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:32 pm to imAMAZING
quote:
I know comparing last year to this year Federer is completely different, but Clicic is also playing the best tennis of his career.
Last year Fed lost to Raonic at Wimbledon, who he just finished beating pretty thoroughly. But yes, I could actually see either Berdych or Cilic beating him although he's got to be the clear favorite against both.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:37 pm to Bunk Moreland
I had Berdych over Djokovic. Don't think my guy will pay it out though
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:45 pm to Roscoe
quote:
Posted by Message
Roscoe
The Unofficial 2017 Wimbledon Thread
Cilic v. Birdman for the title this year.
Looking very possible.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:50 pm to Roscoe
I'd like to see some new blood win at Wimbledon. Only slam that the Big Four has won every single year since 2003 (obvs bc it's the only place Stan hasn't won).
Posted on 7/12/17 at 1:02 pm to BayouBengals03
Still don't know how Andy Murray got included in a group along with the other 3. I mean he's good but he doesn't hold an candle to nadals, djok and feds accomplishments. Should be a big 3 instead.
This post was edited on 7/12/17 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 7/12/17 at 1:08 pm to imAMAZING
Guy has had a heck of a career. 2 Wimbledon, 2 gold medal, 1 US Open, 1 Davis Cup, 8 grand slam runner ups, 14 Masters 1000 titles, 45 tournament titles. But, yeah, he is not quite with the two best players ever or Novak (who is probably like top 5-8).
This post was edited on 7/12/17 at 1:10 pm
Page 21 of 40
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News