- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The replacement refs strike against the Buccaneers
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:29 pm
Had possession and two feet in bounds before getting hit. Looked like a catch to me. Will surely cause a stir whether it was a catch or not.
6
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:30 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
unmute your TV and listen to the real ref they have on the broadcast
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:30 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
he got hit before the 2nd foot was down i believe. The explanation was absolute shite though because that rule shouldn't apply to that play
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:32 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
He had possession before the hit, then lost the ball out of bounds. Should've been a catch first.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:32 pm to TigerBait1127
He had 3 feet down before getting hit. Either way its still incomplete because of the way the stupid rule is written.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:33 pm to VerlanderBEAST
He had full possession and at least 2 feet down before being touched. Getting hit and going to the ground rules should not have applied.
Absolutely screwed.
eta: But don't worry. The replacement refs definitely won't have an effect on any game! Everyone said so!
Absolutely screwed.
eta: But don't worry. The replacement refs definitely won't have an effect on any game! Everyone said so!
This post was edited on 9/16/12 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:34 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
You're not going to hear about it because it favored the Superbowl Champion NY Giants and the NFL doesn't want to pay the real refs.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:35 pm to Lester Earl
It doesn't matter to me. Looked like a catch, I understand why it wasn't called. Like I said though, it doesn't matter either way because it will cause a stir.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:43 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
The regular refs would have made the same call. I think it should have been a catch, most people think that should be considered a catch, but the refs consistently seem to call it a non-catch.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:45 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
quote:
It doesn't matter to me. Looked like a catch, I understand why it wasn't called. Like I said though, it doesn't matter either way because it will cause a stir.
It does matter.
They had to find irrefutable evidence on the call they made. That shouldn't have been overturned.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:47 pm to xenythx
quote:
The regular refs would have made the same call. I think it should have been a catch, most people think that should be considered a catch, but the refs consistently seem to call it a non-catch.
Mike Pierra said to the letter of the law it should be called an incomplete pass. I think they made the right call according to the rule, but in real life it should have been a catch.
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:49 pm to LSUSOBEAST1
Uh no. DB jarred it loose and didn't complete the catch
Posted on 9/16/12 at 3:57 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
He had possession, had an act, and there was no irrefutable evidence to overturn the rule of a catch on the field.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News