- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDBBL Week 12 Preview
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:27 pm to LSU Fan 90812
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:27 pm to LSU Fan 90812
you're trying to get harris now?
lol
lol
1
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:28 pm to PortCityTiger24
i'd take him. who wouldn't 
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:30 pm to LSU Fan 90812
lots of fricked up shite if thats the case.
1. Its already been vetoed
2. Rules clearly stated that 5 votes = veto
3. Krama said he accidentally hit the wrong button..not that he changed his mind.
4. Precedent has been set by a changed vote before.
1. Its already been vetoed
2. Rules clearly stated that 5 votes = veto
3. Krama said he accidentally hit the wrong button..not that he changed his mind.
4. Precedent has been set by a changed vote before.
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:31 pm to NOBODY
mccain = selig.
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:31 pm to LSU Fan 90812
a lot of people getting nervous in this thread
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:32 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:36 pm to LSU Fan 90812
i gotta run... i will respond to emails later guys
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:40 pm to GynoSandberg
good deal bud.
what an interesting day it's been on the trading front.
what an interesting day it's been on the trading front.
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:51 pm to rmc
Point being is that this is borderline as frick and its already been vetoed once.
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:56 pm to NOBODY
my reasoning for vetoing is completely legit.
This post was edited on 1/15/09 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 1/15/09 at 4:58 pm to LSU Fan 90812
karma, i wrote you back
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:01 pm to LSU Fan 90812
a horrible precedent was set a couple weeks back when the league vetoed a trade that would have helped both teams.
This post was edited on 1/15/09 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:06 pm to rmc
port's vote last time would've made 7 objections.
port changed his vote the 2nd vote.
my objection makes 6.
port changed his vote the 2nd vote.
my objection makes 6.
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:11 pm to rmcc316
quote:
hat would have helped both teams.
lol
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:18 pm to rmc
Rick...he didnt change his mind. He inadvertantly hit the wrong button.
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:20 pm to rmc
rick did u see the latest offer i made? what do u thnk
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:21 pm to rmc
quote:
He didn't veto it the first time it was up for vote.
I dont think he voted at all that time.
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:28 pm to rmc
rick, don't take this personally. knat objected for the exact same reason. you and LE should still be able to work out a deal.
and i told you I was going to do that, even before i tried to object.
somebody hasn't voted. i withdraw from this completely. my vote maybe stay as i stood. i accidentally hit approve. maybe my fingers know more than my brain does. better?
Let the people who haven't voted decide.
and i told you I was going to do that, even before i tried to object.
somebody hasn't voted. i withdraw from this completely. my vote maybe stay as i stood. i accidentally hit approve. maybe my fingers know more than my brain does. better?
Let the people who haven't voted decide.
This post was edited on 1/15/09 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:32 pm to LSU Fan 90812
good trade bjl, i'm sure others will say i got fleeced, but i'm happy with it.
Posted on 1/15/09 at 5:36 pm to rmc
when it gets vetoed, ill just reoffer it again bro. Andy and Stout wont object they said
Page 30 of 55
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News