- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stern is a idiot
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:56 pm to hendersonshands
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:56 pm to hendersonshands
well, he didn't wanna be in LA after Stern blew the cover, but all those players are still high on production.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:56 pm to tubucoco
Since when is Lamar Odom a "prime big"?
Oh, you mad. You upset that your ignorant logic gets shot down? Poor baby.
quote:
it's phrased right because I wish I could frickin throw you off a cliff
Oh, you mad. You upset that your ignorant logic gets shot down? Poor baby.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:57 pm to tubucoco
Frick you and the lakers..
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:58 pm to tubucoco
Eric Gordon is 22
Al-Farouq Aminu is 21
Potentially 2 lottery picks in a very deep draft. Let's say the Hornets and T'wolves suck... we could get Anthony Davis and Harrison Barnes. Think about that.
Al-Farouq Aminu is 21
Potentially 2 lottery picks in a very deep draft. Let's say the Hornets and T'wolves suck... we could get Anthony Davis and Harrison Barnes. Think about that.
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:59 pm to hendersonshands
Simple question, was anything wrong with the first deal?
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:59 pm to hendersonshands
Kevin Martin will turn 29 this season.
Eric Gordon will turn 23 on Christmas.
It's really no comparison.
ETA: frick you beat me to it.
Eric Gordon will turn 23 on Christmas.
It's really no comparison.
ETA: frick you beat me to it.
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:00 pm to BayouBengals03
Did you see my Metta World Peace thread? Might be my favorite Ron Artest interview.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:00 pm to BayouBengals03
We wouldn't even be having this conversation if the first deal was approved.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:01 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
hendersonshands
All excellent points; however, this will be his response:
But bruh demps had a good deal for 3 really good big men from the lakers, why wouldnt he jus jump on tht first deal instead of waiting and gettin a better deal? it dont make sense.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:01 pm to tubucoco
quote:
Simple question, was anything wrong with the first deal?
Yes.
We would have been right back to where we are now in two or three years. Potential buyers can see that.
We need an owner. It's our #1 problem right now.
Stern is a very smart guy. He played this pretty great.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:01 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
Did you see my Metta World Peace thread? Might be my favorite Ron Artest interview.
Looking for it now...
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:02 pm to tubucoco
quote:
We wouldn't even be having this conversation if the first deal was approved.
And this whole thread explains why the deal wasn't approved, arse hat.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:02 pm to tubucoco
I don't know why you keep saying 3 bigs. The Clippers deal is better for selling the Hornets, that's it. The NBA owns the Hornets and they dont want to keep owning them. You get a potential star in Gordon on a rookie deal and a potential high lottery pick. Younger, cheaper talent making the team more attractive now and into the future for a buyer. The priority was making the Hornets attractive, not screwing the Lakers.
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:02 pm to hendersonshands
Metta World Peace
but no to answer your question. that dude is in his own world.
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:03 pm to NOSA
Still waiting for the answer on the first deal.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:06 pm to tubucoco
quote:
the deal of Martin, Scola, and Odom, three talented bigs
Martin is a "big"?
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:10 pm to THRILLHO
well, he is a forward, put it that way or swingman if you will, but my whole point was and is that nothing was wrong with the first deal. I'm tired, bout to hit the sack. goodnite.
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:14 pm to tubucoco
quote:
he is a forward
Wrong again, rat
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:17 pm to tubucoco
quote:
a idiot
Always funny.
Posted on 12/14/11 at 11:17 pm to tubucoco
1. The Clippers deal will provide a marketable face of the franchise while the LAL/Hou deal would not have done that.
2. Demps was the GM with without a owner to veto trades that hurt the value of the organization. Stern stepped in to provide that. I doubt many potential owners would have just accepted the LAL/Hou deal as the Hornets wouldn't have been very marketable regardless if the team might have been slightly better this year.
Also Martin was the only real good piece in that deal because he was the youngest.
2. Demps was the GM with without a owner to veto trades that hurt the value of the organization. Stern stepped in to provide that. I doubt many potential owners would have just accepted the LAL/Hou deal as the Hornets wouldn't have been very marketable regardless if the team might have been slightly better this year.
Also Martin was the only real good piece in that deal because he was the youngest.
Popular
Back to top


1






